- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Should Indiana shut down Queen Cait?
Posted on 7/9/25 at 2:29 pm
Posted on 7/9/25 at 2:29 pm
I know it wouldn't be a popular move given her popularity and all. But something is definitely not right with Queen Cait.
She has already missed a good portion of the season because of various injuries and in the last 5 games that she has played in, she's been awful.
She turned in another bad performance today, shooting just 4-12. She finished with 10 points and 6 assists, with 4 turnovers and her team lost for a second time to an expansion team.
The team now has a losing record and is going nowhere fast.
In the last 5 games, Queen Cait is averaging 11 points, shooting 32% from the field (23-71) while averaging 8 assists and 6 turnovers per game.
She's shooting a miserable 20.5% (7-34) from 3-point range, supposedly her specialty.
She is obviously not healthy. Should Indiana go against the league and shut her down or do they continue to play her and risk further and perhaps more permanent injury?
#inbeforenobodycares
She has already missed a good portion of the season because of various injuries and in the last 5 games that she has played in, she's been awful.
She turned in another bad performance today, shooting just 4-12. She finished with 10 points and 6 assists, with 4 turnovers and her team lost for a second time to an expansion team.
The team now has a losing record and is going nowhere fast.
In the last 5 games, Queen Cait is averaging 11 points, shooting 32% from the field (23-71) while averaging 8 assists and 6 turnovers per game.
She's shooting a miserable 20.5% (7-34) from 3-point range, supposedly her specialty.
She is obviously not healthy. Should Indiana go against the league and shut her down or do they continue to play her and risk further and perhaps more permanent injury?
#inbeforenobodycares
6
Posted on 7/9/25 at 2:40 pm to TX Tiger
Bird and Magic said CC doesn't need the WNBA (they need HER) and that she should bolt, go off and create her own team/league....any Saudi Princes out there with leftover LIV money to spare?
Posted on 7/9/25 at 2:45 pm to TX Tiger
Can you link us to all the threads last year you made when reese had bad games? Or this season?
Posted on 7/9/25 at 2:46 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
She turned in another bad performance today, shooting just 4-12. She finished with 10 points and 6 assists, with 4 turnovers and her team lost for a second time to an expansion team.
How’d the rest of her team do?
Posted on 7/9/25 at 3:01 pm to JimTiger72
quote:They got anchored. Like all WNBA threads on this board.
She turned in another bad performance today, shooting just 4-12. She finished with 10 points and 6 assists, with 4 turnovers and her team lost for a second time to an expansion team.
How’d the rest of her team do?
Posted on 7/9/25 at 3:04 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
They got anchored.
A. Boston 6 pts (2-8)
K. Mitchell 12 pts (3-13)
L. Hull 5 pts (2-7)
quote:
Like all WNBA threads on this board.
No just your shitty troll attempts. I’d rather see dong threads.
CC is about to have her get right game on Sunday vs Bueckers & the 6 win Dallas Wings.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 3:05 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
TX Tiger
Your autism is showing. Go play with your train set.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 3:21 pm to JimTiger72
quote:Should be a great game.
CC is about to have her get right game on Sunday vs Bueckers & the 6 win Dallas Wings.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 3:37 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
Should Indiana shut down Queen Cait?
No, they obviously just have to let her play through the struggles. But it's been a disappointing season for the Fever. They put together a very strong roster for this season, and it has been surprisingly better when Clark is out.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 3:52 pm to SEC Doctor
quote:Be careful about posting the truth on this board. You'll be accused of trolling.
They put together a very strong roster for this season, and it has been surprisingly better when Clark is out.
Yes, it is a stacked roster. Yes, they play more like a team when Queen Cait isn't on the court. I wonder at what point the team begins to revolt against her being the focal point of the team. It's just too good to have a losing record.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 4:29 pm to SEC Doctor
quote:
and it has been surprisingly better when Clark is out.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 4:31 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
Be careful about posting the truth on this board.
quote:
has been surprisingly better when Clark is out.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 4:46 pm to TackySweater
Maybe it's a Samson type thing where she need to keep it hairy.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 6:29 pm to TX Tiger
They have 25 games left! Goodness man, give it up. You don’t have to start a Caitlin Clark thread after EVERY single game! NO they shouldn’t shut her down. They haven’t even played half the season!
Posted on 7/9/25 at 6:56 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
Be careful about posting the truth on this board. You'll be accused of trolling
Because you are trolling. You keep claiming that she is popular because she is white and 'presumably' straight. I have brought up other white and legit straight players who are better looking and you don't respond to that. You won't even respond to posters who want to debate you.
So I'd you aren't trolling than you are just fricking dumb. The league was absolutely NOTHING before her and honestly shouldn't exist.
Posted on 7/9/25 at 7:04 pm to dupergreenie
quote:How many times do I have to bring up her stats? Other posters have said it - those who actually watch the games and don't simply listen to the propaganda - that the team is better when she's not on the court.
Be careful about posting the truth on this board. You'll be accused of trolling
Because you are trolling. You keep claiming that she is popular because she is white and 'presumably' straight. I have brought up other white and legit straight players who are better looking and you don't respond to that.
That's not me saying it, that's other posters who actually watch the games.
You, and apparently the admins as well, CLAIM it's trolling because it isn't what you'd like to believe. Well, boo-fricking-hoo.
It's quite obvious to me, and to other posters who actually watch the games, that Queen Cait is an average WNBA player. So you tell me why she is touted as the Second Coming?
tia
Posted on 7/10/25 at 6:19 pm to TX Tiger
Thought I would go and actually look at stats to compare, here are the stats:
The Fever are 5-5 when she plays and 4-5 when she doesn't play.
The Fever split for PPG scored vs against are as follows:
When she plays: 85.5 PPG and allow 81.7 PPG for a +/- of +3.8.
When she doesn't play: 79.9 PPG and allow 76.3 PPG for a +/- of +3.6.
The opposing teams records are as follows:
When she plays: 108-91.
When she doesn't play: 66-107.
So just to recap, she has played 1 more game (10) than she has not played (9). In that time, her team wins more when she plays, scores more points and plays a much tougher schedule yet has a better record. How exactly is her team playing better when she doesn't play? What metric are you using? They played 1 team above .500 without her (Atlanta Dream currently 12-7) and do you know how that game went? They lost 77-58. They have played 5 times without her against the bottom 4 teams (Chicago, Los Angeles, Dallas and Connecticut), in those 5 games, they are 3-2! Conversely, they have played those same teams only 2 times with her, do you know what the record is? 2-0! What does that mean, that they have won some games without her but all but 1 of those came against the worst teams in the league. The only win they have against a team with a decent record without Caitlin Clark came against Las Vegas. I just don't really understand how you can think they are better without her and that if you watch the games it shows that. Can you please point out what they do better without her than with her?
The Fever are 5-5 when she plays and 4-5 when she doesn't play.
The Fever split for PPG scored vs against are as follows:
When she plays: 85.5 PPG and allow 81.7 PPG for a +/- of +3.8.
When she doesn't play: 79.9 PPG and allow 76.3 PPG for a +/- of +3.6.
The opposing teams records are as follows:
When she plays: 108-91.
When she doesn't play: 66-107.
So just to recap, she has played 1 more game (10) than she has not played (9). In that time, her team wins more when she plays, scores more points and plays a much tougher schedule yet has a better record. How exactly is her team playing better when she doesn't play? What metric are you using? They played 1 team above .500 without her (Atlanta Dream currently 12-7) and do you know how that game went? They lost 77-58. They have played 5 times without her against the bottom 4 teams (Chicago, Los Angeles, Dallas and Connecticut), in those 5 games, they are 3-2! Conversely, they have played those same teams only 2 times with her, do you know what the record is? 2-0! What does that mean, that they have won some games without her but all but 1 of those came against the worst teams in the league. The only win they have against a team with a decent record without Caitlin Clark came against Las Vegas. I just don't really understand how you can think they are better without her and that if you watch the games it shows that. Can you please point out what they do better without her than with her?
Posted on 7/10/25 at 6:22 pm to TX Tiger
One more thing, Caitlin Clark just played her 50th game, here is where she ranks ALL-TIME during that same span:
She is first all-time in assist through 50 games (423 to 379)
She is first all-time in 3 pointers made through 50 games (147 to 128)
She is 7th all-time in total points through 50 games (one behind Tamike Catchings and 7 behind A'ja Wilson).
So if you are wondering why people say she has the ability to be an all-time player, here are just a few reasons why.
She is first all-time in assist through 50 games (423 to 379)
She is first all-time in 3 pointers made through 50 games (147 to 128)
She is 7th all-time in total points through 50 games (one behind Tamike Catchings and 7 behind A'ja Wilson).
So if you are wondering why people say she has the ability to be an all-time player, here are just a few reasons why.
Posted on 7/10/25 at 6:56 pm to CalLSU
quote:As of late, having played several games now without her, the Fever - a loaded team - plays more like a team without her on the court.
Can you please point out what they do better without her than with her?
With her on the court, she is the focal point and in the last six games she has stunk up the place.
Posted on 7/10/25 at 6:59 pm to CalLSU
quote:
One more thing, Caitlin Clark just played her 50th game, here is where she ranks ALL-TIME during that same span:
She is first all-time in assist through 50 games (423 to 379)
She is first all-time in 3 pointers made through 50 games (147 to 128)
She is 7th all-time in total points through 50 games (one behind Tamike Catchings and 7 behind A'ja Wilson).
So if you are wondering why people say she has the ability to be an all-time player, here are just a few reasons why.
Two things:
1. She played on a bad team last year, so she was given free range on the court. She was given every opportunity to pile up the stats.
2. If she were black, nobody (especially on this board) would care what her stats were.
ETA: I've said over and over again that she has the potential to be a superstar. My contention has always been that the hype and the popularity is based on race and sexual orientation. If she were black, she wouldn't have anywhere near the popularity she has now. I don't think that can be denied.
This post was edited on 7/10/25 at 7:21 pm
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News