Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 17
Started By
Message

Do the umps make this call at Alex Box?

Posted on 5/31/25 at 8:20 am
Posted by AaronDeTiger
baton rouge
Member since Jun 2014
1793 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 8:20 am
I know MSB, but the call is BS.

ETA:
After reading the rules, looks like they got it right. I hope Jay is going over this today.

This post was edited on 5/31/25 at 8:49 am
Posted by FAP SAM
Member since Sep 2014
3163 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 8:22 am to
The fans' reactions would be a sight to see if they did
Posted by CDawson
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2017
18129 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 8:23 am to
Pussified sports are the thing now. From this to the “safety’ base at first. Football is the worst but this rates right up there with the worst of them.

What’s the runner supposed to do, stop and go around him? Jump over him? Stupidity on sports only gets worse every year.
This post was edited on 5/31/25 at 8:25 am
Posted by Pepe Lepew
Looney tuned .....
Member since Oct 2008
37115 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 8:25 am to
If it’s BS, please explain the rules
Posted by josh336
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
80528 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 8:26 am to
I know my opinion wont be popular, but he couldve dove in hands or feet and touched the plate around the catcher. Its pretty well known you cant run into the catcher. Attempt to go around
Posted by Puffoluffagus
Savannah, GA
Member since Feb 2009
6340 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 8:26 am to
Eh yeah. probably should have not called anything and let it go with the call being safe at the plate.

Catcher was blocking plate prior to receiving the ball. Should have been obstruction.

Even though the runner "let up" prior to contact, he clearly had no intention of sliding into the plate on what would have been a close play at the plate. But the catcher blocking trumps the runner imo.
Posted by AaronDeTiger
baton rouge
Member since Jun 2014
1793 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 8:26 am to


Catcher's Obstruction: If a catcher blocks home plate without the ball while the runner attempts to score, it’s obstruction unless the runner deviates unnecessarily (Rule 8-3-e).

This post was edited on 5/31/25 at 8:30 am
Posted by Ed Osteen
Member since Oct 2007
58396 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 8:26 am to
Student section would have sent beer cans all over the field
Posted by josh336
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
80528 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 8:28 am to
Its ok for the catcher to block if he is getting the ball before the runner gets there, which he clearly was before he dropped it
Posted by Bacon84
Texas
Member since Oct 2012
1033 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 8:28 am to
I have no problem with the green base because it prevents unnecessary injury.

But this play is at home is bullshite.
Posted by Open Your Eyes
Member since Nov 2012
9856 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 8:30 am to
quote:

I know my opinion wont be popular, but he couldve contorted his body unnaturally and risked injuring himself or not touching the plate in order to avoid touching the player that was obstructing his path to home plate without the ball

Corrected for accuracy
Posted by josh336
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
80528 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 8:31 am to
Sliding is unnatural? Lol. Did the ball get to the catcher before the runner? Yes or no?
Posted by Puffoluffagus
Savannah, GA
Member since Feb 2009
6340 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 8:31 am to
quote:

Its ok for the catcher to block if he is getting the ball before the runner gets there, which he clearly was before he dropped it


Eh, its subjective. I think the catcher set up to recieve the ball in front of the plate thus blocking.

Its different if the catcher is set up outside of the path, but has to move into the path to receive the ball, which imo didnt happen in this case.
Posted by AaronDeTiger
baton rouge
Member since Jun 2014
1793 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 8:34 am to
Runner’s Responsibilities at Home Plate:

Legal Slide or Avoidance: When a play is imminent at home plate, the runner must either slide legally (feet-first, directly into the plate, without altering their path to target the catcher) or attempt to avoid contact with the catcher (Rule 8-7). A legal slide involves contact with the ground before reaching the base and staying within reach of the plate (Rule 2-77).

I guess this is where they got him.

Posted by Open Your Eyes
Member since Nov 2012
9856 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 8:34 am to
quote:

Sliding is unnatural? Lol.

He did slide. You want him to slide around and reach back to touch the plate. Yes, that’s unnatural.

quote:

Did the ball get to the catcher before the runner? Yes or no?

Oh wait, you’re stupid enough to think the catcher was in possession of the ball when the contact happened?
Posted by josh336
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
80528 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 8:34 am to
I dont disagree. I just cant stand the people acting like this is some huge injustice when its clear that dude had no intention of sliding (he didnt). It was a close tough call. And if he slides, he is safe
This post was edited on 5/31/25 at 8:37 am
Posted by josh336
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
80528 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 8:36 am to
quote:

He did slide

We watching the same play?

Go read the post above relating to what is considered a slide. He tried to slide too late

quote:

Oh wait, you’re stupid enough to think the catcher was in possession of the ball when the contact happened

Im smart enough to realize the ball was about to be possessed well before the runner got to the plate if not for the drop off the glove.
This post was edited on 5/31/25 at 8:38 am
Posted by Open Your Eyes
Member since Nov 2012
9856 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 8:39 am to
quote:

We watching the same play?

Clearly not. You think the catcher was in possession of the all when the contact occurred.

quote:

Im smart enough to realize the ball was about to be possessed well before the runner got to the plate if not for the drop off the glove.

Posted by CottonWasKing
4,8,15,16,23,42
Member since Jun 2011
29283 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 8:40 am to
quote:

josh336



I agree with you.


If he slides he’s either safe or he draws the obstruction call.

This dude had no intention of sliding the whole way until he got cold feet at the very end and eased up.

It was malicious and the catcher was in the process of fielding the throw.

It was the right call
Posted by WylieTiger
Member since Nov 2006
13972 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 8:40 am to
At least the crew was consistent regarding their interpretation of obstruction. The double steal that ended the top of the 8th had the Oregon catcher "obstructing" as in not providing a clear path to home for the UV baserunner.

I thought the call against us in the SEC tournament against South Carolina last year was way worse than this one.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 17
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 17Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram