- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Remember gold star mom Tina Peters is sitting in prison today because of corrupt Dems
Posted on 5/26/25 at 4:40 pm
Posted on 5/26/25 at 4:40 pm
quote:
‘I’m not going to be intimidated’: Colorado attorney general says Trump administration cannot free Tina Peters
quote:
Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser said Wednesday that the federal government has no standing to free former Mesa County clerk Tina Peters from jail.
“We have our own system,” Weiser said in an interview with Colorado Matters. “This is what our constitution calls federalism. We enforce our criminal laws and the federal government can't hijack that system. They have to honor it. We are a separate sovereign.”
https://www.cpr.org/2025/05/14/phil-weiser-trump-cannot-free-tina-peters/
Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser
20
Posted on 5/26/25 at 4:42 pm to loogaroo
quote:
We have our own system,” Weiser said in an interview with Colorado Matters. “This is what our constitution calls federalism. We enforce our criminal laws and the federal government can't hijack that system. They have to honor it. We are a separate sovereign.”
What a slimy cuck. I’m sure he follows every federal law he can find. Especially the immigration ones.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 4:44 pm to loogaroo
quote:
Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser
If he's not gay, he can at least explain what penis tastes like in great detail
Posted on 5/26/25 at 4:55 pm to loogaroo
So libs are now all about state's rights all of the sudden?
What a timeline we live in.
What a timeline we live in.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 4:56 pm to jrobic4
Would be terrible if someone resorted to violence.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 4:58 pm to idlewatcher
We know it won’t be Ashli Babbitt trying to break in to free her 
Posted on 5/26/25 at 5:06 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
We know it won’t be Ashli Babbitt trying to break in to free her
Posted on 5/26/25 at 5:10 pm to loogaroo
Bondi needs to ratchet up the pressure on Colorado in this case. Another political prisoner of the former Regime.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 5:11 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
We know it won’t be Ashli Babbitt trying to break in to free he
Trump broke you. It’s sad really.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 5:12 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
We know it won’t be Ashli Babbitt trying to break in to free her
We also know Commierado won't be holding legitimate elections anytime soon, as well.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 5:13 pm to loogaroo
Says some voting machines were compromised when she was attempting to check for voter fraud with some other folks.
Did she do something calculated there or did they get her for just having folks around the machines when they weren’t supposed to be?
Did she do something calculated there or did they get her for just having folks around the machines when they weren’t supposed to be?
Posted on 5/26/25 at 5:18 pm to boosiebadazz
Posted on 5/26/25 at 5:20 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
We know it won’t be Ashli Babbitt trying to break in to free he
Posted on 5/26/25 at 5:23 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
Says some voting machines were compromised when she was attempting to check for voter fraud with some other folks.
Did she do something calculated there or did they get her for just having folks around the machines when they weren’t supposed to be?
I believe she gave confidential data to a third party who had no authorization to possess the data, without proper authorization, and prior to that illegally accessed the database to download/transfer the data.
This was a pretty clear cut case IIRC.
This post was edited on 5/26/25 at 5:24 pm
Posted on 5/26/25 at 5:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This was a pretty clear cut case IIRC.
You obviously don’t recall. The entire case was lawfare on steroids. She was targeted for having an unpopular opinion.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 5:25 pm to loogaroo
Milk toast creep!
Posted on 5/26/25 at 5:25 pm to Riverside
quote:
The entire case was lawfare on steroids. She was targeted for having an unpopular opinion.
What about the allegations was incorrect?
Did she give confidential data to a third party?
Did she illegally access that information prior to transfer?
I didn't think either of those things was in dispute, but I can pull up articles about the case again if my memory is wrong.
This post was edited on 5/26/25 at 5:26 pm
Posted on 5/26/25 at 5:26 pm to boosiebadazz
You are a piece of shite. Plain and simple.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 5:29 pm to loogaroo
quote:
“There's going to be appeals in state court. We're handling that work and we're going to handle it with integrity and commit to the rule of law,” Weiser said. “And we're not going to be intimidated by the administration that has shown a disregard for the rule of law and a willingness to try to essentially use fear tactics.
“I'm not going to be intimidated. I'm not going to be afraid. I'm going to defend the rule of law.”
I guarantee you he will use every tactic he can to delay these appeals.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 5:30 pm to loogaroo
I know nothing about this case and I’m sure some activist judges and DAs are involved in the persecution of a political dissident but what does her being a gold star mom have to do with it?
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News