- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
DC Circuit Court of Appeals handed President Trump a massive win on Saturday
Posted on 5/3/25 at 9:59 pm
Posted on 5/3/25 at 9:59 pm
LINK
quote:
The liberal DC Circuit Court of Appeals handed President Trump a massive win on Saturday after a district court judge ordered him to rehire staff from far-left Voice of America that will have impacts lasting beyond just this one case, according to a legal expert.
As The Gateway Pundit reported, a federal judge last month ordered the Trump Administration to rehire Voice of America (VOA) and other affiliate news services staff. The affiliate staff included Radio Free Asia and the Middle East Broadcasting Network.
In March, Trump placed employees and contractors for government-funded Voice of America on leave.
US District Judge Royce Lamberth, a Reagan appointee, said Voice of America is funded by Congress and Trump’s cuts to the agency are “a direct affront to the power of the legislative branch.”
He then granted a preliminary injunction.
Thanks to this ridiculous decision, Voice of America staffers were set to return to work next week, and the station was set to resume broadcasting. But then an unexpected setback occurred this afternoon.
The DC Court of Appeals entered a stay of Lamberth’s injunction and suspended the first-instance decision, blocking the order that allowed them to return to work.
quote:
“The Court of Appeals decision is based on fundamental issue of “jurisdiction,” she explained. “This conclusion should have wide-spread ramifications because many of challenges to Trump Administration are about employment decisions which CONGRESS said are NOT for district courts to decide.”
quote:
Cleveland summed up her analysis of the massive decision by noting Trump achieved a big win that will apply to other cases brought against him for three key reasons: First, courts have no jurisdiction over firings; second, they have no jurisdiction over grant terminations; and third, judges can use creative ‘loopholes’ to get around Congress.
“In sum, this opinion is a HUGE win for Trump because it establishes 3 key principles that apply to many of the other cases being brought against Trump Administration: a) no jurisdiction over firings; b) no jurisdiction over grant terminations; c) you can’t get around Congress limiting district court jurisdiction by creative pleading of claims under other theories
5
Posted on 5/3/25 at 10:05 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
More winning baws!
Posted on 5/3/25 at 10:09 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
warning to the left!
It is Gateway Pundit, beating the shite out of the esteemed MSM.
The article includes a tweet from noted "bad candidate" Kari Lake.
The bitch that AZ "elected" governor proved her worth today or yesterday by vetoing a bill requiring her and their bitch Sec State to obey immigration law.
It is Gateway Pundit, beating the shite out of the esteemed MSM.
The article includes a tweet from noted "bad candidate" Kari Lake.
The bitch that AZ "elected" governor proved her worth today or yesterday by vetoing a bill requiring her and their bitch Sec State to obey immigration law.
Posted on 5/3/25 at 10:15 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Finally a judge in our favor
Posted on 5/3/25 at 10:18 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
SFP meltdown he’ll be here to say why she is wrong.
Posted on 5/3/25 at 10:27 pm to ninthward
wrong as usual.
Posted on 5/3/25 at 10:37 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
How is a Reagan appointee still on the bench?
I know it’s a life time appointment but that’s at least 37 years.
That’s insane
I know it’s a life time appointment but that’s at least 37 years.
That’s insane
Posted on 5/4/25 at 12:24 am to SlowFlowPro
still looking for a valid definition of "Viewpoint Discrimination"
Posted on 5/4/25 at 12:36 am to SlowFlowPro
This guy fronting as a legal scholar is sad.
Little boy, these guys are playing in fields of knowledge of law, that a 3rd rate clown lije you can't fathom.
Little boy, these guys are playing in fields of knowledge of law, that a 3rd rate clown lije you can't fathom.
Posted on 5/4/25 at 1:27 am to ChatGPT of LA
Big Time Victory! District courts have no jurisdiction which everyone above the IQ of moron already knew.
Posted on 5/4/25 at 6:22 am to Goforit
Let us make sure this stays near the top so that everyone can enjoy it.
Posted on 5/4/25 at 6:40 am to RohanGonzales
quote:
Let us make sure this stays near the top so that everyone can enjoy it.
Pretty quiet thread. I thought it would have been on fire by now.
The OT Pizzaballa thread has more traffic...
Posted on 5/4/25 at 6:44 am to Trevaylin
quote:
still looking for a valid definition of "Viewpoint Discrimination"
I believe I posted multiple links in the other thread explaining it for you
Posted on 5/4/25 at 6:46 am to Goforit
quote:
District courts have no jurisdiction which everyone above the IQ of moron already knew.
I believe you're making a much more general comment than what the court ruled
District courts lack jurisdiction over a very specific set of claims.
quote:
The Tucker Act vests the Court of Federal Claims with jurisdiction over claims against the United States “founded … upon any express or implied contract with the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1). We have long held that this jurisdictional grant, where it applies, is exclusive and thus bars application of the sovereign-immunity waiver set forth in the APA
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News