Kash Patel

After the recent promotion of that dickhead Jensen to head the DC Field Office, I’ve pretty much lost all confidence in Kash.

quote:

---

That guy's a politician now.

---

I dont think so, but I KNOW Bongino is not a politician. He's as real as it gets. IMHO

quote:

---

After the recent promotion of that dickhead Jensen to head the DC Field Office,

---

So I've been thinking about this. I'm going to let this slide for now, maybe there's something more to that than we know. There might not be, and it won't be the first time somebody in DC turned out to be useless, but im holding out hope.

I've listed to Bongino for a long time. I know this dude is a patriot with my all my heart. If he can't get it done, then it isn't going to get done. The corruption is just too big. I heard him say not long before taking the FBI position, that someone said he needed to let the Russia collusion hoax go. He responded with, "I'm not letting shite go". I still remember that plainly in my mind. Therein lies my hope

Careful now, people will claim you have TDS if you show any skepticism towards the DOJ getting shite done

At a minimum, I would like to see the DOJ get more aggressive. When you read editorials in the WSJ that are more aggressive than what Bondi, Kash & Co are doing, it does not inspire confidence.

For instance, this article right here from a week ago:
WSJ

Why are we not doing this? They need to take the lawfare head on and use every tool available to stop the roadblocking and end the judicial coup


Edit:

"The Trump administration is locked in a standoff with Judge James Boasberg over deportation flights under the Alien Enemies Act. Officials could face contempt proceedings, and the president and his supporters have called for the judge’s impeachment. Yet the administration seems to be overlooking a critical legal tool—injunction bonds.

The argument is rock solid: Under Rule 65(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a party seeking an injunction needs to put up a bond to cover its costs. These bonds aren’t optional. They’re mandatory, unless the government is seeking an injunction. That means Judge Boasberg’s order, and dozens like it, may not be valid at all.

President Trump identified this legal off-ramp in a March 11 memorandum directing the Justice Department to demand bonds in future injunction cases. Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley echoed the call. But the Justice Department hasn’t pressed the issue, either in Judge Boasberg’s courtroom or other high-stakes cases in which activist judges have blocked major policies without requiring plaintiffs to put a single dollar at risk."

There's an almost zero chance you see anyone like schiff go down.

People like him do and say what they want because they know there's ZERO chance of repercussions.

You got to be handicapped I'd you think anything at all is coming from any of these 3.

1000%.

The pipe bomber is probably not going to be resolved, but Patriot Front... If they could chase down every person at J6, they can certainly find all the baws at the FBI. I mean they share a office.