- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Save Our Park System—Nix HB 86 AND 87
Posted on 4/5/25 at 9:18 am
Posted on 4/5/25 at 9:18 am
State Rep. Dixon McMakin, sponsor of these two bills aimed at upending BREC, has said they will improve efficiency and bring about cost savings.
HB 86 eliminates the current BREC commissioner structure and places BREC under the control of the mayors of Baton Rouge, Baker, Zachary, Central and St. George, and, by extension, their city councils. What happens when those parties start vying for resources and squabbling over annual budget allocations, perhaps tapping BREC dedicated funds to shore up their own budgets?
The City-Parish already has a $40 million deficit and wants to tap dedicated tax funds to close the gap. What will happen to our parks system if BREC is brought under local management?
Moreover, HB 87 dissolves BREC as a state entity, which has been in place since 1946 because Baton Rouge was not funding its park system. How does it benefit the people of EBR Parish to return to that situation?
These bills are part of a surreptitious campaign to eliminate the nine-hole golf course and turn City Park, Baton Rouge’s first park, into an amusement venue with kiddie rides, an amphitheater, paddleboat rentals, restaurants, and a running track. City Park will NEVER be able to support all the hardscape and concrete called for by the marauders so-called “vision,” and the additional traffic/parking load will be horrendous.
Having lost at the ballot box, the marauders are trying to upend BREC and get control of the park by means of legislation and a “conservancy” tied to the Lakes Project, which has nothing to do with City Park except its proximity to the south end of the park.
Last year, City Park Golf Course supported more than 26,000 rounds, nearing the capacity of 30,000 rounds established for it by the National Golf Foundation in 2014.
If the course is reconfigured or disappears entirely, Baton Rouge proper will have only one public golf course remaining—Webb Park—which already has more than 50,000 rounds played yearly. This is counter to national trends in golf. In an era where course contractions outpace openings, the municipal golf supply has increased by 140 courses since 2004, according to Golf Industry Magazine (March, 2025)
Stop the marauders! Call or write your representatives and senators and tell them to kill HB 86 and HB 87.
HB 86 eliminates the current BREC commissioner structure and places BREC under the control of the mayors of Baton Rouge, Baker, Zachary, Central and St. George, and, by extension, their city councils. What happens when those parties start vying for resources and squabbling over annual budget allocations, perhaps tapping BREC dedicated funds to shore up their own budgets?
The City-Parish already has a $40 million deficit and wants to tap dedicated tax funds to close the gap. What will happen to our parks system if BREC is brought under local management?
Moreover, HB 87 dissolves BREC as a state entity, which has been in place since 1946 because Baton Rouge was not funding its park system. How does it benefit the people of EBR Parish to return to that situation?
These bills are part of a surreptitious campaign to eliminate the nine-hole golf course and turn City Park, Baton Rouge’s first park, into an amusement venue with kiddie rides, an amphitheater, paddleboat rentals, restaurants, and a running track. City Park will NEVER be able to support all the hardscape and concrete called for by the marauders so-called “vision,” and the additional traffic/parking load will be horrendous.
Having lost at the ballot box, the marauders are trying to upend BREC and get control of the park by means of legislation and a “conservancy” tied to the Lakes Project, which has nothing to do with City Park except its proximity to the south end of the park.
Last year, City Park Golf Course supported more than 26,000 rounds, nearing the capacity of 30,000 rounds established for it by the National Golf Foundation in 2014.
If the course is reconfigured or disappears entirely, Baton Rouge proper will have only one public golf course remaining—Webb Park—which already has more than 50,000 rounds played yearly. This is counter to national trends in golf. In an era where course contractions outpace openings, the municipal golf supply has increased by 140 courses since 2004, according to Golf Industry Magazine (March, 2025)
Stop the marauders! Call or write your representatives and senators and tell them to kill HB 86 and HB 87.
This post was edited on 4/5/25 at 3:17 pm
Posted on 4/5/25 at 9:38 am to Bendelow
Why do they spend money on youtube/radio ad’s? Seems like that can cut some cost.
Posted on 4/5/25 at 10:39 am to Bendelow
BREC is clearly poorly run. But, getting rid of City Park would be a terrible idea. It serves an excellent purpose.
Posted on 4/5/25 at 12:16 pm to Bendelow
Getting rid of it would be horrible.
It got 27,000 rounds last year.
The courses are crowded enough as it is.
It got 27,000 rounds last year.
The courses are crowded enough as it is.
Posted on 4/5/25 at 1:41 pm to CBandits82
Not making clark a full 18 was a giant mistake.
It actually has held up incredibly well
It actually has held up incredibly well
Posted on 4/5/25 at 7:47 pm to Bendelow
BREC is bloated and inefficient. They can’t take care of their business. We deserve better.
Posted on 4/5/25 at 8:52 pm to Bendelow
quote:
And the City-Parish isn't?
Neither one is doing well, but BREC is run by unelected commissioners and is insulated from the public.
No golfer should support BREC.
Posted on 4/5/25 at 10:00 pm to Bendelow
Nix 86 and Send 87 to heaven
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:13 am to Bendelow
They’ve been trying to take city park for years. It’s a shame if that’s what this is really about.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 1:19 pm to Camp Randall
Yes, it is what it is all about. Plus, punishing BREC for not bending to their wishes about City Park and public golf courses in general. BREC has already reduced the number of courses from seven to five, but that is not enough for them.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 6:53 pm to Bendelow
Name names. I read Rolfe Mccollister and maybe the chick that owns varsity sports want city gone so I stopped supporting her and I never supported Rolfe. Who else?
This post was edited on 4/6/25 at 8:43 pm
Posted on 4/6/25 at 8:08 pm to Bendelow
Brec is poorly run and needs a total revamp. These bills would be a great start. Those who live around city park have been against any kind of progress there for years and use scare tactics to keep the status quo. You sound like one of them. I like the course and sometimes play there but it could be a cool park with amphitheater and other amenities that the entire city could utilize.
Posted on 4/7/25 at 7:42 am to Camp Randall
A few non-profits and business organizations.
This post was edited on 4/7/25 at 4:55 pm
Posted on 4/7/25 at 7:43 am to In The Know
I see you live in St. George. You like the way the city runs things? Think it could do a much better job than BREC?
And wanting to keep a nearly 100-year-old park as it is doesn’t mean anyone is opposed to progress. There is room for having such things as an amphitheater without changing the basic footprint of the park.
And no, I don’t live near City Park. I live nearer to Perkins Road Park, which is of little use to me and a good example of what City Park might become if the “visionaries” have their way.
And wanting to keep a nearly 100-year-old park as it is doesn’t mean anyone is opposed to progress. There is room for having such things as an amphitheater without changing the basic footprint of the park.
And no, I don’t live near City Park. I live nearer to Perkins Road Park, which is of little use to me and a good example of what City Park might become if the “visionaries” have their way.
This post was edited on 4/7/25 at 5:26 pm
Popular
Back to top
