- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

We might nuke Iran - Scott Ritter
Posted on 3/20/25 at 9:40 pm
Posted on 3/20/25 at 9:40 pm
This is live right now so I don't have a time stamp but Ritter's comments are pretty early. He's saying that Iran is very close to having a nuclear weapons program and that in the past they had a prohibition on having nukes. He says people involved in the program have been coming out and saying that if existential threats present themselves, then Iran could / should remove the prohibition. He says that, if that is done, it will be very quick and Iran will have nukes (days not months or years). Ritter says all of this signals to him that Iran has the pieces there, ready to be assembled, so to speak, and it's a matter of spinning up some uranium which can happen fast.
Ritter says in the past Trump was told that conventional weapons would not destroy Iran's nuke program because the targets are hardened, deep underground, etc. He believes the intel people are letting Trump know about this status with Iran and whether it's because of Israel or not, Trump is likely to say this is not acceptable. He mentions some new developments / changes with low yield US nuclear weapons to put them on platforms that are going to be suited for deep penetration. Ritter says that when this happens it'll be a comprehensive attack - nuke sites, leadership, etc. Ritter says this is why, or this is indicated by Trump going to Congress to talk about this issue (I didn't know he went and asked permission or notified Congress about Iran's nuke program, maybe he's referring to the speech in front of both chambers.).
Ritter goes on to say 'I don't think Trump really wants to do this' and the host says 'it'll end his presidency'. Ritter says Russia and China don't want to see Iran go nuclear and they may be able to help. Reading between the lines though it seems Iran believes they have to have a nuclear deterrent capability because of Israel. If we were to nuke Iran, I can't see that producing a good reaction around the world and whatever is left of Iran would desperately look for ways to get back at the US and eventually that would mean we get nuked in some fashion.
First I've seen this mentioned as realistic and something that could happen soon, so, passing it along.
Ritter says in the past Trump was told that conventional weapons would not destroy Iran's nuke program because the targets are hardened, deep underground, etc. He believes the intel people are letting Trump know about this status with Iran and whether it's because of Israel or not, Trump is likely to say this is not acceptable. He mentions some new developments / changes with low yield US nuclear weapons to put them on platforms that are going to be suited for deep penetration. Ritter says that when this happens it'll be a comprehensive attack - nuke sites, leadership, etc. Ritter says this is why, or this is indicated by Trump going to Congress to talk about this issue (I didn't know he went and asked permission or notified Congress about Iran's nuke program, maybe he's referring to the speech in front of both chambers.).
Ritter goes on to say 'I don't think Trump really wants to do this' and the host says 'it'll end his presidency'. Ritter says Russia and China don't want to see Iran go nuclear and they may be able to help. Reading between the lines though it seems Iran believes they have to have a nuclear deterrent capability because of Israel. If we were to nuke Iran, I can't see that producing a good reaction around the world and whatever is left of Iran would desperately look for ways to get back at the US and eventually that would mean we get nuked in some fashion.
First I've seen this mentioned as realistic and something that could happen soon, so, passing it along.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 9:46 pm to POTUS2024
Trump has his hands full
No need to hit Iran
I find that unacceptable if it were to be
Israel stuff we’re learning about their influence on our foreign policy is bothering me
No need to hit Iran
I find that unacceptable if it were to be
Israel stuff we’re learning about their influence on our foreign policy is bothering me
Posted on 3/20/25 at 9:46 pm to POTUS2024
Well if Scott Ritter says so...
Posted on 3/20/25 at 9:52 pm to POTUS2024
Scott Ritter reminds me of Dick Morris with his knowledge.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 9:54 pm to POTUS2024
Even if Iran can’t develop a nuke.. someone has already sold them nukes many years ago
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:27 pm to POTUS2024
Even if they have nukes the second they use them they will cease to ever exist again.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:28 pm to momentoftruth87
At least we can rest knowing they’ll hit Israel first. We have time.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:29 pm to supadave3
And worry about radicals getting nukes in Pakistan
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:32 pm to stout
quote:
Well if Scott Ritter says so...
He pays attention to this stuff but the fact that he's the only one mentioning this means he's either the smartest guy in the room or reading the tea leaves incorrectly.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:34 pm to POTUS2024
Yeah if the administration was leaking this to start to prepare people they'd pick someone with a wider audience
so its the Pentagon,,a disgruntled Admiral
so its the Pentagon,,a disgruntled Admiral
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:43 pm to POTUS2024
Ritter has a sandy vagina and likes smelling his on farts.
Popular
Back to top
7









