- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Greenpeace ordered to pay $667 Million to Energy Transfer over pipeline protests
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:43 am
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:43 am
Will they ever see the money?
quote:
(Reuters) — Greenpeace must pay a Texas-based pipeline company nearly $667 million in damages for the environmental advocacy group’s role in 2016-2017 protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline in North Dakota, a jury said Wednesday.
The verdict in North Dakota state court came after two days of deliberations in a trial where pipeline company Energy Transfer accused Greenpeace of paying protesters to disrupt construction of the pipeline unlawfully and spreading falsehoods about the controversial project, located near the Standing Rock Indian Reservation. The verdict included damages for defamation, trespassing and conspiracy. The jury awarded more than $400 million in punitive damages, which are intended to punish defendants for their conduct.
Greenpeace denied wrongdoing and called the case an attack on free speech rights. The group’s lawyers said they would appeal Wednesday’s verdict. “We’re an advocacy group. We engage in peaceful protest,” said Greenpeace attorney Deepa Padmanabha, asserting that the group only played a minor role in the demonstrations.
Energy Transfer lawyer Trey Cox said in a statement that Greenpeace’s “violent and destructive” protests were not legally protected speech. “Today, the jury delivered a resounding verdict, declaring Greenpeace’s actions wrong, unlawful, and unacceptable by societal standards. It is a day of reckoning and accountability for Greenpeace,” Cox said.
This post was edited on 3/20/25 at 10:46 am
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:44 am to HoustonGumbeauxGuy
does Greenpeace have that kind of cake or is this another symbolic judgement?
This post was edited on 3/20/25 at 10:47 am
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:45 am to HoustonGumbeauxGuy
I imagine between this and USAID getting gutted that the "financial viability" of Greenpeace ain't as bright as it used to be.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:47 am to 777Tiger
quote:USAID was their cosigner!!!
does Greenpeace have that kind of cake or is another symbolic judgement?
This post was edited on 3/20/25 at 10:48 am
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:47 am to HoustonGumbeauxGuy
This will likely put Greenpeace out of business. Another win for America
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:51 am to HeadCall
quote:
This will likely put Greenpeace out of business. Another win for America
Will it though…
They will likely file for bankruptcy like the Catholic Church but with no assets and reform under a new variation of GreenPeace.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:55 am to HoustonGumbeauxGuy
Looking at their 990 from 2023, they don't have near that kind of money.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 11:02 am to DWaginHTown
quote:
Looking at their 990 from 2023, they don't have near that kind of money.
What about Greenpeace international and Greenpeace Fund? They were named in the lawsuit too.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 11:04 am to HoustonGumbeauxGuy
Organizations like this and the stop oil idiots don’t understand that by being antagonistic assholes, they’re pushing people away from their cause and making a mockery of it
And it’s a shame, because we actually should have a conversation about where we put pipelines, where we drill, etc. But if the conversation starts with some unhinged white woman screaming in my face about how awful I am for literally driving in a car, then frick you and your cause.
And it’s a shame, because we actually should have a conversation about where we put pipelines, where we drill, etc. But if the conversation starts with some unhinged white woman screaming in my face about how awful I am for literally driving in a car, then frick you and your cause.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 11:11 am to HeadCall
quote:
What about Greenpeace international and Greenpeace Fund?
Greenpeace Inc had net assets of just under 5 million
Greenpeace Fund had net assets of 39 million
Not sure about international.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 11:14 am to Crow Pie
quote:
I imagine between this and USAID getting gutted that the "financial viability" of Greenpeace ain't as bright as it used to be.
Hopefully this extends to every nonsense leftwing NGO full time activist group. I cannot believe the number of people available to participate in the nonsense they conduct relentlessly.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 11:17 am to Dadren
quote:
And it’s a shame, because we actually should have a conversation about where we put pipelines, where we drill, etc. But if the conversation starts with some unhinged white woman screaming in my face about how awful I am for literally driving in a car, then frick you and your cause.
It's always Joe the taxpayer getting bombarded bt the activists, never the people who fund their movements (wealthy celebrities and other dynastic family enterprises like the Kelloggs, Rockefellers, Jobs, and Pritzkers).
Posted on 3/20/25 at 11:27 am to HeadCall
The jury found Greenpeace USA must pay the bulk of the damages, nearly $404 million, while Greenpeace Fund Inc. and Greenpeace International would each pay roughly $131 million.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 11:48 am to HoustonGumbeauxGuy
The mess the environmentalists left behind after their protest at Standing Rock.


Posted on 3/20/25 at 11:56 am to HoustonGumbeauxGuy
quote:
Greenpeace ordered to pay $667 Million

Posted on 3/20/25 at 1:14 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:Standing Rock looks to be renamed to a more eco-sensitive name like Scattered Trash.
The mess the environmentalists left behind after their protest at Standing Rock.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 1:59 pm to 777Tiger
quote:
does Greenpeace have that kind of cake or is this another symbolic judgement?
nope, they will file for bankruptcy and create GP+ and just keep on annoying people.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 4:30 pm to HoustonGumbeauxGuy
quote:
pipeline protests
quote:
Energy Transfer lawyer Trey Cox said in a statement that Greenpeace’s “violent and destructive” protests were not legally protected speech.
frick greenpeace and everyone involved in terrorism and destruction of property
Posted on 3/20/25 at 5:53 pm to HoustonGumbeauxGuy
Popular
Back to top

10







