Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

In the past century there was a total of 27 nation wide injunctions against ex branch.

Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:12 pm
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
138420 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:12 pm
Trump has had 46 injunction in 2 months.

And SFP still doesn’t understand lawfare is an issue. (Or that it even exists).
Posted by Strannix
President Trump's America
Member since Dec 2012
51402 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:14 pm to
SlowFanniPro isnt very bright to begin with, they/thems acute TDS has exacerbated the condition.
Posted by RohanGonzales
Member since Apr 2024
5519 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

SlowFanniPro isnt very bright to begin with, they/thems acute TDS has exacerbated the condition.


and he will lie about what he really believes as needed
Posted by Rolek
Member since Sep 2018
226 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:15 pm to
Why do people still reply to that troll? Just ignore and downvote.
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
67236 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

Why do people still reply to that troll?

They love him, he's their favorite poster. They beg for him to show up in practically every single thread and then bitch about him being in threads. They just can't quit SFP.
This post was edited on 3/19/25 at 12:19 pm
Posted by Bwmdx
Member since Dec 2018
3210 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:20 pm to
They understand just fine. They are just here to obfuscate and divert and likely getting paid to do it.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
82910 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:23 pm to
This is somewhat of a chicken or the egg problem. Trump very clearly wants to change the status quo and that sometimes abuts up to and contravenes existing law and precedent. I think most of you guys see that as a feature, not a bug.
This post was edited on 3/19/25 at 12:24 pm
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
51651 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

Trump has had 46 injunction in 2 months.

And SFP still doesn’t understand lawfare is an issue. (Or that it even exists).


All the Dims have left is lawfare, they will not stop until a few high profile Dims are forced to endure the same lawfare shite Trump, Bannon, Navarro, Roger Stone, Michael Flynn, etc. had to endure. It needs to happen x10.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
452944 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

This is somewhat of a chicken or the egg problem.


Correct. I discussed how we'd have to measure this in detail either yesterday or the day before, but ultimately the standard relies on a lot of subjectivity so nobody would ever agree and it would devolve into partisanship.

quote:

Trump very clearly wants to change the status quo and that sometimes abuts up to and contravene existing law and precedent. I think most of you guys see that as a feature, not a bug.

The easy example this term is birthright citizenship.
Posted by coolpapaboze
Parts Unknown
Member since Dec 2006
18466 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:25 pm to
I don't know why people engage with that troll. If you really don't like him, ignore him. He's clearly got some weird and unhealthy compulsion about posting here and needs to get help.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
25490 posts
Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

Trump very clearly wants to change the status quo and that sometimes abuts up to and contravenes existing law and precedent.


You can make that argument but sometimes it doesn't even sniff contravening "existing law and precedent", and they still try to interfere. Clearly there are other factors at play here.

https://www.npr.org/2025/03/18/nx-s1-5332409/transgender-troops-ban-preliminary-injunction
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram