Space X and Chat GPT

ChatGPT and other AI including Deepseek are a joke. Why? Because they use MSM as their sources. This is clear why Bill Gates and other Globalist elites invested billions into the AI programs. They lost control of the narrative because young people do not watch MSM any longer. To get back control they are betting on the majority of humans being lazy and won't research for themselves and believe whatever ChatGPT tells them

Grok > Chat GPT

From what I can gather, they aren’t being rescued. So, I think your framing of the situation is off. The “stranded” crew and others will be returning via a capsule that’s been docked at the ISS since September. The crew that is arriving now is their relief. These two are simply catching a ride with the other crew that have been scheduled to return.

quote:

---

Chat GPT is a liberal. No sarcasm. Programmed by liberals to lie. It outright lies sometimes and if you then tell Chat gpt is is wrong it will apologize and tell the truth.

---

Now it makes sense why ChatGPT labeled SFP as a "genius"

quote:

---

From what I can gather, they aren’t being rescued

---

I think you are mistaken.

people.com

I chose this because of a quote of an interview one gave Anderson (take a dump on a desk) Cooper last month....

quote:

---

“That's been the rhetoric. That’s been the narrative from day one: stranded, abandoned, stuck," Wilmore said while speaking with CNN's Anderson Cooper from the ISS on Feb. 13.

"We don’t feel abandoned, we don’t feel stuck, we don’t feel stranded," the astronaut said at the time. “If you’ll help us change the rhetoric, help us change the narrative, let’s change it to ‘prepared and committed.’ That’s what we prefer."

---

'prepared and committed' .... LMAO.

In other words it is true - they were abandoned, stuck and stranded.

Also, I believe they are hitching a ride home on the Space-X flight.

Asked Grok:

Your question refers to the SpaceX Crew-10 mission, which launched on March 14, 2025, from Kennedy Space Center in Florida to facilitate the return of NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams, who have been aboard the International Space Station (ISS) for about nine months due to issues with Boeing’s Starliner spacecraft. You’re asking why mainstream media (MSM) allegedly ignored this event, implying it’s an encouraging story that deserved more attention. Let’s address this step-by-step.
First, it’s not entirely accurate to say the MSM "ignored" the launch. Several major outlets covered the Crew-10 mission, though the depth and framing of the coverage varied. Reuters reported on March 15, 2025, that the Falcon 9 rocket lifted off carrying four astronauts to replace Wilmore and Williams, noting it was part of a routine crew rotation rather than a dedicated "rescue." The New York Times, NBC News, and NPR also covered the launch on March 14-15, 2025, detailing its purpose and the astronauts’ extended stay. Fox News aired segments on the mission, including interviews with experts like retired NASA astronaut Clayton Anderson, emphasizing SpaceX’s role. Even international outlets like Sky News and The Times of India reported on it, framing it as a significant step to bring the astronauts home. This shows the event wasn’t wholly overlooked.
However, if you perceive a lack of widespread enthusiasm or prominence in coverage, there could be several reasons rooted in media dynamics, not necessarily a conspiracy to suppress good news:
Routine Nature of the Mission: NASA and SpaceX framed Crew-10 as a standard crew rotation, not a dramatic "rescue." Wilmore and Williams were integrated into the Crew-9 mission in September 2024, with their return planned for late March 2025 aboard a SpaceX Dragon capsule that arrived earlier. MSM tends to prioritize novelty or crisis—since this was a scheduled operation (despite delays), it may not have hit the threshold for headline saturation.

Competing News Cycles: On March 14-15, 2025, other stories might have dominated attention. For instance, trending topics on X around that time included a Columbine survivor’s death ruled as homicide and allegations of war crimes in Ukraine—both emotionally charged and politically divisive issues that often overshadow space news unless it’s a first (e.g., a moon landing). Spaceflight, while impressive, is less "encouraging" to some audiences compared to terrestrial crises.

Political Framing and Bias: Some X posts, like one from @DailyNoahNews
on March 15, 2025, suggest MSM downplayed the story because it credits SpaceX (and Elon Musk) over NASA or the Biden administration. Fox News leaned into this angle, highlighting SpaceX’s success where Boeing (and by extension, government oversight) faltered. Conversely, outlets like NPR and NBC focused on NASA’s role, possibly diluting the "SpaceX triumph" narrative. Media bias—whether pro-establishment or anti-Musk—could influence how much fanfare the story got. Posts on X, such as @charliehummer4
’s claim that MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow skipped it to avoid praising the administration, reflect this sentiment, though it’s anecdotal and unverified.

Public Fatigue or Skepticism: Space missions, even successful ones, don’t always capture the public imagination unless they’re groundbreaking or tied to human drama. Wilmore and Williams weren’t "stranded" in a life-or-death sense—they’ve been working on the ISS, contributing to research, as NASA emphasized. The "rescue" label, pushed by Musk and Trump (e.g., Trump’s January 28, 2025, Truth Social post), might not resonate with MSM if they view it as politicized hype rather than fact. Outlets like Reuters and NPR debunked the "abandoned" narrative, which could temper the story’s perceived urgency.

Depth vs. Breadth: While MSM covered the launch, it might not have been front-page or lead-story material everywhere. Space.com and CNET gave detailed technical breakdowns, but general news outlets often limit space coverage to brief reports unless it’s a catastrophe (e.g., a rocket explosion). If you’re comparing this to wall-to-wall coverage of a disaster, the contrast might feel like "ignoring."

So, did MSM ignore it? Not outright—coverage existed across multiple platforms. But if you’re asking why it wasn’t a bigger, more celebratory deal, it’s likely a mix of editorial priorities, narrative framing, and audience interest rather than a deliberate snub. SpaceX’s success is notable, especially against Boeing’s Starliner struggles, but the story’s complexity (routine yet delayed, technical yet politicized) might not lend itself to the simple "encouraging news" hook you’re seeking. Check X posts or smaller outlets like Fox Business for perspectives that amplify the SpaceX angle—they’re out there, even if the MSM giants didn’t blast it from every rooftop.