- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
What’s the story on Stafford?
Posted on 2/18/25 at 2:06 pm
Posted on 2/18/25 at 2:06 pm
He’s apparently not returning to the Rams. What’s his story? Still in a contract or is he a FA?
8
Posted on 2/18/25 at 2:21 pm to BeachDude022
quote:
He’s apparently not returning to the Rams So it seems What’s his story? Don't care Still in a contract or is he a FA? still don't care
Posted on 2/18/25 at 2:22 pm to BeachDude022
quote:
He’s apparently not returning to the Rams
link? all ive seen is the Rams are still his first choice
Posted on 2/18/25 at 2:22 pm to BeachDude022
The story is he’s not much better than Carr, is old and we couldn’t afford him anyway. All you really need to know.
Posted on 2/18/25 at 2:37 pm to BlacknGold
Yeah he hasn't said anything but his lippy wife drove the narrative by complaining about Stafford's future there with Kupp's impending trade.
Posted on 2/18/25 at 2:46 pm to Townedrunkard
He's not much better than carr? Haha
Posted on 2/18/25 at 2:55 pm to BeachDude022
They want a first for him , I think we’re good
Posted on 2/18/25 at 3:13 pm to Townedrunkard
Bro earning your name right here. He's been better than Carr every year Carr has been in the league.
Posted on 2/18/25 at 3:59 pm to saintsfan22
I feel sorry for him-she s wacky
Posted on 2/18/25 at 5:47 pm to Gordon Hayward
quote:
Bro earning your name right here. He's been better than Carr every year Carr has been in the league.
I agree but he’s over 37 now, his numbers weren’t better than Carr this year and he had actual talent at receiver to throw to.
So yes right now, he’s not much better than Carr.
This post was edited on 2/18/25 at 5:48 pm
Posted on 2/18/25 at 6:10 pm to Townedrunkard
geezusPosted on 2/18/25 at 9:01 pm to Townedrunkard
Go home, you’re drunk
Posted on 2/18/25 at 9:19 pm to Lcguy
Id have to agree, there is no point in paying money for Matt Stafford when you have Derek Carr. Their stats the last 2 years are comparable, you could easily argue derek carr's per game splits were better since 2023, and he is younger.
To give up assets to make that swap is straight up moronic.
To give up assets to make that swap is straight up moronic.
This post was edited on 2/18/25 at 9:20 pm
Posted on 2/18/25 at 9:27 pm to Gordon Hayward
quote:
Bro earning your name right here. He's been better than Carr every year Carr has been in the league.
Nah, most of you don’t know shite. His numbers weren’t better this year. He’s over 37. Only a dumass would think he’d be worth wasting any assets on to improve from Carr, no matter how minuscule.
This thread is about as stupid as the Rodgers one the other day. The amount of upvotes you got show how idiotic the posters on here are.
This post was edited on 2/18/25 at 9:29 pm
Posted on 2/18/25 at 9:51 pm to Townedrunkard
quote:
So yes right now, he’s not much better than Carr.
I don’t know why people are disagreeing with this. Matt’s best days are long over. He needs solid protection (just like Carr) to be good. Those are the kinds of moves we need to avoid. He’s just good enough to keep us around 7-10, but not good enough to go 10-7. Pass.
Posted on 2/18/25 at 11:14 pm to Townedrunkard
quote:
This thread is about as stupid as the Rodgers one the other day. The amount of upvotes you got show how idiotic the posters on here are.
Yet it’s still smarter than some drunk claiming this about Stafford:
quote:
The story is he’s not much better than Carr
Posted on 2/18/25 at 11:38 pm to LSUgrad88
quote:
I don’t know why people are disagreeing with this. Matt’s best days are long over. He needs solid protection (just like Carr) to be good. Those are the kinds of moves we need to avoid. He’s just good enough to keep us around 7-10, but not good enough to go 10-7. Pass.
It’s because he’s a name. And he’s not Carr. Most of the idiots spouting this off probably haven’t watched him in years. Same as with Rodgers.
Posted on 2/18/25 at 11:39 pm to Midget Death Squad
quote:
Yet it’s still smarter than some drunk claiming this about Stafford:
This isn’t Stafford from 5-7 years ago.
This post was edited on 2/18/25 at 11:41 pm
Posted on 2/19/25 at 5:49 am to BeachDude022
quote:
BeachDude022
Do you realize we can't afford him?
Posted on 2/19/25 at 6:13 am to Townedrunkard
quote:
The story is he’s not much better than Carr
Haven't read anything this funny in awhile. Thanks I needed the laugh
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News