- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Did the Rebecca Lobach scrubbing accomplish anything?
Posted on 2/3/25 at 2:03 am
Posted on 2/3/25 at 2:03 am
It seems like they missed a lot. We all know she was a woke lesbian politically connected Dem who was given preference over others.
Are there even more sinister things that we don't know?
And what is with all the people referring to her as a hero?
If everyone in the military is a hero, I guess so, but that cheapens the word.
Are there even more sinister things that we don't know?
And what is with all the people referring to her as a hero?
If everyone in the military is a hero, I guess so, but that cheapens the word.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 2:24 am to Stinger_1066
She was the pilot of an United States Army military aircraft that was in the wrong airspace that collided with a civilian aircraft killing 64 civilians on a civilian piloted aircraft and 2 U.S. Army War fighters on the aircraft she was piloting. She is not a hero.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 2:50 am to Stinger_1066
It sure made a lot of people ask WTF is going on here
Posted on 2/3/25 at 3:09 am to Stinger_1066
quote:
Rebecca Lobach
Her name will be etched in infamy for killing 70+ people
Posted on 2/3/25 at 3:20 am to Stinger_1066
Two things can be true.
Was the pilot “out of the lane” for lack of a better description? Yes. Whether that was pilot error, instructor error, I doubt we will ever know. Don’t discount there was a more experienced pilot in the bird as well. If the more experienced pilot was familiar with the rules and area I suspect “following the rules” has been ignored for a long time and the odds finally caught up with them.
Did the ATC fail to advise both aircraft there was a collision alert? It seems so. Both aircraft could and should have taken action given the standard procedures each aircraft would have had in place.
So if we are going to ascribe the majority of the blame IMO it should be the ATC.
Now if you want to get into why they are understaffed due to DEI priorities which had pervaded hiring, have at it. As we just got a pointed example of why “the best” is the only criteria for that job.
Was the pilot “out of the lane” for lack of a better description? Yes. Whether that was pilot error, instructor error, I doubt we will ever know. Don’t discount there was a more experienced pilot in the bird as well. If the more experienced pilot was familiar with the rules and area I suspect “following the rules” has been ignored for a long time and the odds finally caught up with them.
Did the ATC fail to advise both aircraft there was a collision alert? It seems so. Both aircraft could and should have taken action given the standard procedures each aircraft would have had in place.
So if we are going to ascribe the majority of the blame IMO it should be the ATC.
Now if you want to get into why they are understaffed due to DEI priorities which had pervaded hiring, have at it. As we just got a pointed example of why “the best” is the only criteria for that job.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 3:39 am to Stinger_1066
Not all veterans are the same. No idea why anyone gives a frick about a person who never saw combat. She was a shitty pilot who killed 66 people. Not sorry if that hurts anyone’s feelings.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 3:48 am to llfshoals
Hard to see where the American Airlines pilot did anything wrong. He could not hear the response of the chopper since they were on a different frequency. Had he been able to hear, things may have turned out differently. Also, the ATC did not know this was a "training flight." If they had known that fact they probably would have responded differently. The pilot on the video below explained that having 500 hours of flying time is just enough to get the chopper up and down.
He has flown into the same airport and said that the ATC should have never allowed to separate on visual identification. He explained how difficult it is at night to get a visual especially when the aircraft were miles apart and the lights of the surrounding area tends to blend together.
He demonstrated how the angle of the plane and chopper would have created blind spots for both. Also, with the avionics of the chopper the pilot needed to dial in a correct elevation of the airport on the altimeter. He said if the wrong number was dialed in it could explain why the chopper thought they were at 200ft when in fact they were at a higher altitude.
He said there were a series of mistakes made by multiple people. He does believe it will not go well for the ATC. The video is about 30 minutes but he does a good job of explaining how this tragedy probably came about.
LINK
He has flown into the same airport and said that the ATC should have never allowed to separate on visual identification. He explained how difficult it is at night to get a visual especially when the aircraft were miles apart and the lights of the surrounding area tends to blend together.
He demonstrated how the angle of the plane and chopper would have created blind spots for both. Also, with the avionics of the chopper the pilot needed to dial in a correct elevation of the airport on the altimeter. He said if the wrong number was dialed in it could explain why the chopper thought they were at 200ft when in fact they were at a higher altitude.
He said there were a series of mistakes made by multiple people. He does believe it will not go well for the ATC. The video is about 30 minutes but he does a good job of explaining how this tragedy probably came about.
LINK
This post was edited on 2/3/25 at 3:52 am
Posted on 2/3/25 at 3:49 am to The Boat
I’m kinda surprised Trump/ Pete held the name out for so long considering her back ground. I guess they were really trying to respect the family but that allowed for scrubbing.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 3:56 am to Stinger_1066
quote:
And what is with all the people referring to her as a hero?
Most of these people are democrats, supporting someone who died while on duty, who was also a lesbian and a staunch liberal.
These are mentally ill liberals, who don't look at the fact that her incompetence killed 60+ innocent people. She is no hero.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 4:05 am to The Boat
Simple fact of the matter is we don’t know if they were good or bad yet.
Was the pilot in airspace they should not have been in? Evidence we have as of now says yes. If they did so on their own I will absolutely agree both them and the instructor should have never been in the bird in the first place.
Why were they in it is extremely important. If you’ve been behind the yoke you know when an ATC gives you instruction you follow it. Especially at night you just can’t tell exactly where something is. I know, I’ve been there. Disobey an ATC instruction and you will be lucky if they only revoke your flight status.
The logs from the ATC are absolutely vital to know what happened leading up to it. I have said before and will say again having two aircraft on plane (same altitude) in close proximity is a terrible idea and their “pass behind the aircraft” I hear on the recording we can hear is absolutely insane. You’re asking a pilot to eyeball a pass with another aircraft and your converging speed is probably 500mph, and let’s not forget in the fisking DARK.
A fighter pilot probably could, but I doubt anyone else can.
Was the pilot in airspace they should not have been in? Evidence we have as of now says yes. If they did so on their own I will absolutely agree both them and the instructor should have never been in the bird in the first place.
Why were they in it is extremely important. If you’ve been behind the yoke you know when an ATC gives you instruction you follow it. Especially at night you just can’t tell exactly where something is. I know, I’ve been there. Disobey an ATC instruction and you will be lucky if they only revoke your flight status.
The logs from the ATC are absolutely vital to know what happened leading up to it. I have said before and will say again having two aircraft on plane (same altitude) in close proximity is a terrible idea and their “pass behind the aircraft” I hear on the recording we can hear is absolutely insane. You’re asking a pilot to eyeball a pass with another aircraft and your converging speed is probably 500mph, and let’s not forget in the fisking DARK.
A fighter pilot probably could, but I doubt anyone else can.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 4:05 am to llfshoals
quote:
So if we are going to ascribe the majority of the blame IMO it should be the ATC.
throwing shite up against the wall? I see you know ZERO about Air Traffic Control, ZERO. As a former ATC, you are doing nothing but supporting the woke dead pilot, with no facts whatsoever.
Here are the facts. The weather was VFR conditions. The chopper was cleared, traffic was given, and the chopper pilot acknowledged site of the jet. AT that point, the chopper pilot took over full responsibility and released by ATC, which is standard practice.
Has ATC been severely impacted by the DEI BS, and paying a price? Absolutely. I am sure we are going to hear a lot about that, and changes will be made. I am also sure that the media will try and protect the blame away from the woke lesbian, inexperienced Pilot, because she was a supporter of their agenda. However, they are in a tight spot, because in doing so, they will be pointing the finger at DEI hires of ATC.
The Pilot should have never been in that position, due to lack of experience. The only reason she was is because of her ties to the Biden Administration, which run deep. This entire situation blows for the Innocents that should have never died without DEI.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 4:14 am to Goforit
quote:
The pilot on the video below explained that having 500 hours of flying time is just enough to get the chopper up and down.
No shite, she should have been nowhere close to that position, and likely would not have without her connection to the Biden Administration. I'm sure she was a celebrated individual in the Army given her close ties to the Biden Family, and was fast tracked.
quote:
He does believe it will not go well for the ATC.
I'm sure this will be the narrative of the media, depending on who was working ATC. Again, she was supposedly cleared for landing with visual contact of the jet. Responsibility was transferred to her. A very sad situation that someone that should not have been in that position, was put into it not based upon merit, and many innocent people had to die.
It is kind of hard to blame ATC, when it was clear weather and the chopper pilot acknowledged visual of the jet prior to the crash. When you watch it, I don't see any way the chopper pilot could not see the jet as she came from a steep angle to hit the side of the jet.
One last thing...everyone is defending the parents over scrubbing everything on social media to prevent backlash. It won't stop the backlash, at all. But, it may hide other details, which was most likely the intent. It was them trying to hide a bad picture.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 4:18 am to llfshoals
quote:
ATC gives you instruction you follow it.
again, you have no idea what you are talking about in your attempt to defend the Pilot. You have no idea what VFR conditions are, and who the responsibility goes to when ATC clears you to land while pointing out traffic. It is very clear you know nothing about any of that, but it isn't stopping you.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 4:33 am to Mandtgr47
In a video I cited earlier, a pilot said how difficult it was for a chopper some miles away to visualize one plane at night in a congested area with all the surrounding lights. A plane flies with its nose slightly tilted upwards while the chopper flies with its nose titled slightly downward. He said the front panel of the chopper with nose of the craft pointed downward would have prevented the pilots of the chopper from seeing the plane above them.
He said the chopper pilots were probably looking at runway 1 and not 33. The aircrafts' combined speeds was approximately 280. The ATC should not have assumed that the chopper's visualization was correct. That assumption got a lot of people killed. Had the ATC known that it was a training flight and the pilot had only 500 hrs. of flying time he probably would have reacted differently.
The instruction to go behind the jet was a nebulous statement because the chopper did not know where the plane actually was located. Someone should have been tracking the flights on radar and seen they they were on a collision course. The chopper should have been told to descend and turn immediately to avoid an impact. One question should be answered and that is whether the ATC was a DEI hire.
He said the chopper pilots were probably looking at runway 1 and not 33. The aircrafts' combined speeds was approximately 280. The ATC should not have assumed that the chopper's visualization was correct. That assumption got a lot of people killed. Had the ATC known that it was a training flight and the pilot had only 500 hrs. of flying time he probably would have reacted differently.
The instruction to go behind the jet was a nebulous statement because the chopper did not know where the plane actually was located. Someone should have been tracking the flights on radar and seen they they were on a collision course. The chopper should have been told to descend and turn immediately to avoid an impact. One question should be answered and that is whether the ATC was a DEI hire.
This post was edited on 2/3/25 at 4:36 am
Posted on 2/3/25 at 4:34 am to Goforit
Great link. One of the comments I read was from a retired ATC and directing the Blackhawk to make an immediate 90 degree turn to avoid a potential conflict was an instant reaction for them.
The response from the helicopter pilot couldn’t have seen the plane that they saw it after the ATC asked if they had a visual. Guy doing the analysis did a great job of pointing that out.
Failure on the ATC for even asking to get a visual compounds that error.
The response from the helicopter pilot couldn’t have seen the plane that they saw it after the ATC asked if they had a visual. Guy doing the analysis did a great job of pointing that out.
Failure on the ATC for even asking to get a visual compounds that error.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 4:38 am to Mandtgr47
quote:
She is no hero.
It’s perplexing to me why anyone would call her that.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 4:40 am to llfshoals
quote:
The response from the helicopter pilot couldn’t have seen the plane that they saw it after the ATC asked if they had a visual. Guy doing the analysis did a great job of pointing that out.
Failure on the ATC for even asking to get a visual compounds that error.
This would be funny if it weren't a part of such a tragedy. It blows my mind the mental gymnastics you are doing to try and defend the Pilot. On top of it, you are trying to act like you understand ATC. ATC DID NOT GIVE THE CHOPPER PILOT INSTRUCTIONS TO TURN RIGHT 090. WHAT ATC DID WAS CLEAR THE PILOT IN WHICH THE PILOT ACKNOWLEDGED A VISUAL OF THE JET.
Wow. You people know no boundaries to defend your own people.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 4:56 am to Mandtgr47
quote:I’m not trying to defend the pilot. I’m pointing out there are two factors in this, which seems to be getting overlooked.
again, you have no idea what you are talking about in your attempt to defend the Pilot
Both the pilot and the ATC are at fault. The ATC however is the one in control of the situation.
quote:The commercial craft is following instructions, and apparently has no idea there’s a potential conflict. Not that he could likely see it either. Whether the plane has been turned over to the tower or not is a moot point.
You have no idea what VFR conditions are, and who the responsibility goes to when ATC clears you to land while pointing out traffic
And you might want to think about what you just said about who is giving instructions here. It’s the ATC.
The pilot fails by giving the impression they see the airliner, an instruction that IMO is insane given the situation. The visual on the ATC screen clearly has two aircraft on a converging course. 200 feet of altitude separation on the screen is nothing especially considering the plane is descending to land.
The copter pilot also fails because they are too high. Now (as his link points out) is it an altimeter problem, did the instructor advise them to fly at that height, did they do it on their own?
I’m asking questions we may get answers to when the black box data comes out.
As of now the primary fault is the ATC. I am not absolving the copter pilot as there is plenty of blame to throw on the helicopter, however you’re leaving out the instructor who is also a contributing factor.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 4:59 am to llfshoals
The overlying issue is you don’t understand that visual separation is used constantly in the National Airspace System and it would grind to a halt if it wasn’t.
If the helo had lost visual, they should have said so.
About the time of the second traffic call, I’m guessing that the controller wasn’t liking his spacing. That would’ve been a great time for a vector (turn issued to avoid traffic). But the rule book isn’t a big fan of vectoring aircraft at 100’ because there’s a lot of obstructions and terrain features that low.
If the helo had lost visual, they should have said so.
About the time of the second traffic call, I’m guessing that the controller wasn’t liking his spacing. That would’ve been a great time for a vector (turn issued to avoid traffic). But the rule book isn’t a big fan of vectoring aircraft at 100’ because there’s a lot of obstructions and terrain features that low.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 5:07 am to Stinger_1066
First I’ve heard she was a lesbian.
Popular
Back to top


19





