Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Why was Connie Nielsen so bad in Gladiator 2?(spoilers)

Posted on 2/2/25 at 10:09 pm
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
33082 posts
Posted on 2/2/25 at 10:09 pm
I’m not one to usually notice bad acting and I’m far from a movie critic, but her acting as Lucilla was HORRIBLE. I didn’t think she was bad in the first one or in other things she’s been in, but man she’s bad in this.

The scene where she tells Hano/Lucius his dad was Maximus is just so bad, completely took me out of the moment.
Posted by TankBoys32
Member since Mar 2019
4005 posts
Posted on 2/2/25 at 10:29 pm to
That movie as a whole wasn’t terrible if you look at it more as a 300 style movie rather than a sequel to Gladiator which itself is immaculate
Posted by SECSolomonGrundy
Slaughter Swamp
Member since Jun 2012
18090 posts
Posted on 2/2/25 at 10:30 pm to
quote:

That movie as a whole wasn’t terrible if you look at it more as a 300 style movie


300 was amazing when it came out. Gladiator 2 was always pure shite.
This post was edited on 2/2/25 at 10:31 pm
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
33082 posts
Posted on 2/2/25 at 10:38 pm to
quote:

That movie as a whole wasn’t terrible

Overall I agree it’s not that bad it just can’t compare to the first. Her acting is horrible though
Posted by BuckeyeWarrior
Naples, FL
Member since Jan 2025
622 posts
Posted on 2/2/25 at 11:36 pm to
quote:

That movie as a whole wasn’t terrible if you look at it more as a 300 style movie


300 is a much more enjoyable, inspiring, and artistic film than Gladiator 2 could ever hope to be.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
60285 posts
Posted on 2/3/25 at 6:17 am to
Gladiator POOH


amirite??
Posted by TankBoys32
Member since Mar 2019
4005 posts
Posted on 2/3/25 at 7:34 am to
Of course. I’m saying it’s more over the top like 300 is compared to Gladiator 1
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
20788 posts
Posted on 2/3/25 at 7:35 am to
quote:

Overall I agree it’s not that bad it just can’t compare to the first. Her acting is horrible though

Gladiator 2 was bad and horribly choppy. It felt like they made major edits and what was left didn’t mesh or flow comfortably.

And yes, some of the acting was atrocious, but for a few of the actors I wonder how much of that was due to what direction they were getting.

Overall the whole thing felt like a CW level production of Gladiator.
Posted by Zap Rowsdower
MissLou, La
Member since Sep 2010
15634 posts
Posted on 2/3/25 at 7:45 am to
I just can’t get over them just titling it Gladiator 2. I’m not sure why it irks so much but it does

It makes it sound corny like a sequel to another generic action or super hero movie instead of the next chapter of one of the best movies of the past 30 years. Like they could have simply called it Hano and still found a way to let the viewers know it was a sequel to Gladiator .
Posted by BeepBopBoop
Northshore
Member since Dec 2023
1179 posts
Posted on 2/3/25 at 7:59 am to
Have you seen Scott's Napoleon? Gladiator 2 is a masterpiece comparatively.

Posted by SECSolomonGrundy
Slaughter Swamp
Member since Jun 2012
18090 posts
Posted on 2/3/25 at 9:37 am to
quote:

Have you seen Scott's Napoleon? Gladiator 2 is a masterpiece comparatively.



Nah they both equally suck. I give Napoleon the slight edge only bc it wasnt a sequel. Phoenix and Denzel both phoned in a shitty performance that they never should have been cast for.
Posted by JetsetNuggs
Member since Jun 2014
15323 posts
Posted on 2/3/25 at 9:43 am to
quote:

Gladiator which itself is immaculate


Watched it last night because it's probably my favorite of all time and I didn't feel like starting something new.

It's so good that I don't want to watch Gladiator 2 with the lukewarm and negative reactions to it
This post was edited on 2/3/25 at 9:45 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram