Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Early Signing Day for football "under review"

Posted on 1/11/09 at 7:49 pm
Posted by thunderbird1100
GSU Eagles fan
Member since Oct 2007
71490 posts
Posted on 1/11/09 at 7:49 pm
Don't know how seriously they are going to take it but at least the proposal is out there. I doubt we get it though since in CFB these days what the majority wants is the opposite of what they get (see: playoffs).

LINK
This post was edited on 1/11/09 at 7:51 pm
Posted by Ice Cold
Over Macho Grande
Member since Jun 2004
18853 posts
Posted on 1/11/09 at 8:33 pm to
IMHO, FWIW, I think it's ridiculous that DI football gets treated differently than every other sport, e.g., men's basketball (signing day), DI-AA football (playoff), and so on.

I think this is a great idea, but one more likely to pass before recruiting became such a $$$ game.
Posted by geauxpng
new orleans
Member since Jan 2009
9 posts
Posted on 1/11/09 at 10:50 pm to
this would help LSU alot
Posted by thunderbird1100
GSU Eagles fan
Member since Oct 2007
71490 posts
Posted on 1/11/09 at 10:53 pm to
quote:

this would help LSU alot


It's just good for the lot of CFB.

Many guys know exactly where they want to go and would like to get recruiting over as quickly as possible because they dont want information from other schools or to constantly talk to other coaches (basically don't want to be bothered). With an early signing period in December the guys can get recruiting off their backs (who want to) instead of having to hear nonsense and stuff they don't want to talk about until they sign on the dotted line in Feb.
Posted by sweatmeatUSMC
BR
Member since Dec 2007
951 posts
Posted on 1/11/09 at 10:56 pm to
i dont like it, just like i dont like the rule that players cant transfer after coaching changes. if a coach is doing poorly and recruits well, selling the "rebuild the program well" pitch, then gets fired after signing day, then the kids are left in a bad situation. should be about the kids, the student athletes and whats best for them. just my two cents
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
61866 posts
Posted on 1/11/09 at 10:57 pm to
quote:

this would help LSU alot


PP wouldn't be a Tiger if this rule was in place last year. He'd be at the U.
Posted by geauxpng
new orleans
Member since Jan 2009
9 posts
Posted on 1/11/09 at 10:59 pm to
But we would have more time to recruit a reuben randle or debose and not have to worry about guys like or janzen jackson decommiting even if it is just rumors
Posted by Purplehaze
spring, tx
Member since Dec 2003
2295 posts
Posted on 1/11/09 at 11:04 pm to
Early signing day would prevent a lot of questionable financial transactions that currently happen in January. Of course, it means that those who do not sign in December will get a lot more attention in January and the price would go up due to limited supply for those schools who missed out in the early signing period.
Posted by pioneerbasketball
Team Bunchie
Member since Oct 2005
139098 posts
Posted on 1/11/09 at 11:17 pm to
quote:

i dont like it, just like i dont like the rule that players cant transfer after coaching changes. if a coach is doing poorly and recruits well, selling the "rebuild the program well" pitch, then gets fired after signing day, then the kids are left in a bad situation. should be about the kids, the student athletes and whats best for them. just my two cents
Posted by sweatmeatUSMC
BR
Member since Dec 2007
951 posts
Posted on 1/11/09 at 11:51 pm to
haha, that quote mean you agree?
Posted by Tigercat
Tacoma, WA
Member since Feb 2004
4519 posts
Posted on 1/12/09 at 12:22 am to
And its an issue in college basketball as well, but lots of schools just let prospects out of the LOI if they really want to leave because of a coaching change.

But even with that minor issue in college basketball, the consensus is it has been good for the schools and the athletes in that sport; it would be good for football as well.
Posted by lynxcat
Member since Jan 2008
24986 posts
Posted on 1/12/09 at 1:05 am to
I'm not sure what my opinion on this topic is yet....
Posted by TL3
Natchez, Mississippi
Member since Jan 2004
5545 posts
Posted on 1/12/09 at 2:55 am to
This will never happen in football. Why you ask well companies such as ESPN, Rivals, & scout will not allow it. ESPNU for example on signing day will have coverage for like 6 hours on their network on where these kids are going to school, plus live announcements, and you really think ESPN and Rivals are going to let people mess with their money.
Posted by ironsides
Nashville, TN
Member since May 2006
8154 posts
Posted on 1/12/09 at 4:48 am to
quote:

Early signing day would prevent a lot of questionable financial transactions that currently happen in January.


So they would just happen earlier then?
Posted by hiveredtech
Gulf Breeze, FL
Member since Dec 2008
201 posts
Posted on 1/12/09 at 10:24 am to
It is better than nothing...but I would prefer it to be even earlier.
Posted by bwallcubfan
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2007
38791 posts
Posted on 1/12/09 at 10:30 am to
quote:

Early Signing Day for football


Someone educate me on this. Does this mean if you are committed by the early signing period, you have to sign the LOI or could you still wait? I know bball has this but I don't follow that as closely as football.
Posted by Ellashuer
gonzales, LA
Member since Dec 2008
174 posts
Posted on 1/12/09 at 9:40 pm to
I like it this means these kids can hurry up and pick instead of (I wanna go here,no I dont I wanna go here)they need to just make up their frickn minds.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram