Started By
Message
locked post

Uncle Joe trying to push national digital ID through before Jan?

Posted on 8/25/24 at 7:57 am
Posted by Night Vision
Member since Feb 2018
18788 posts
Posted on 8/25/24 at 7:57 am
Posted by tgrmeat
Member since Sep 2020
5600 posts
Posted on 8/25/24 at 8:02 am to
I thought identification was racist? No? Only when it comes to voting?
Posted by lazcreek
Galvez
Member since Feb 2004
1125 posts
Posted on 8/25/24 at 8:08 am to
Well that should end the “poor people don’t have Id’s issue” Most poor people are on government assistance so they will all now have ID. No reason then not to have voter ID in every election.
Posted by FATBOY TIGER
Valhalla
Member since Jan 2016
12858 posts
Posted on 8/25/24 at 8:13 am to
frick him and the jackass he rode in on
Posted by GruntbyAssociation
Member since Jul 2013
8508 posts
Posted on 8/25/24 at 8:15 am to
Bible prophecy

Revelation 13: 16-17
16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

This post was edited on 8/25/24 at 8:18 am
Posted by Padme
Member since Dec 2020
9256 posts
Posted on 8/25/24 at 8:18 am to
Indeed
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465347 posts
Posted on 8/25/24 at 8:21 am to
Shocking an echo chamber content creator is lying.

NOTUS Article: States Are Beginning to Adopt Digital Driver’s Licenses. Biden May Supercharge the Transition.

quote:

The Biden administration is laying the groundwork for wider acceptance of digital identifications, like driver’s licenses you can show on your smartphone — a push that could fundamentally reshape how citizens access everything from public benefits to pornography online.

A draft of a forthcoming executive order viewed by NOTUS pushes federal and state governments to speed adoption of smartphone-based mobile driver’s license and ID options more widely, stating: “It is the policy of the executive branch to strongly encourage the use of digital identity documents.”


quote:

The draft order, if implemented, would ostensibly address a growing problem: The government has lost billions of dollars in fraudulent claims to benefit programs using forged identification cards. It would also mandate federal agencies adopt a single government-run identity system, Login.gov, as a gateway to federal websites and offer that system to state and local governments for integration.


quote:

A growing number of states are passing laws requiring age verification to view adult-themed websites or sign up for social media accounts, but few good solutions exist currently to implement those laws.

The result is growing interest in creating a form of digital ID to use on the web, ending decades of a freewheeling internet architecture in which anonymity and age verification were largely on the honor system or reliant on low-quality smartphone scans of physical driver’s licenses.


Louisiana has all of this, currently

However, there is nothing about punishment for refusing to sign up.

In fact, I couldn't even find the lying article that was screen-shotted in that post. I don't know if it even exists.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465347 posts
Posted on 8/25/24 at 8:22 am to
quote:

Bible prophecy

Revelation 13: 16-17
16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.


Not applicable

quote:

At the same time, ID.me has faced privacy and civil liberties questions about its facial recognition software and objections from lawmakers and other critics about allowing a private sector company to act as the gateway to public websites. (Login.gov is also now integrating facial recognition to comply with certain government security requirements.)

The draft executive order tells agencies to provide easy-to-use alternatives to people who do not want to submit to automated facial recognition scans. In plans to roll out, Login.gov allows people to have their physical IDs checked at a post office in lieu of the facial scan, while ID.me has a live video call option and in person verification at 650 retail locations. It also bans the sale of biometric data like face scans by government and contractors and prevents governments from using that kind of data for anything other than identity verification.


It's actually adding alternative ID options, not mandating a single one.
Posted by TigerSooner
Member since Nov 2023
3572 posts
Posted on 8/25/24 at 8:23 am to
That's what I was just thinking. This scumbag may literally be the Antichrist.

JESUS, COME SOON!!
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465347 posts
Posted on 8/25/24 at 8:24 am to
quote:

That's what I was just thinking. This scumbag may literally be the Antichrist.

JESUS, COME SOON!!


Posted by CoachChappy
Member since May 2013
34073 posts
Posted on 8/25/24 at 8:32 am to
quote:

I thought identification was racist? No? Only when it comes to voting?


Of course it is. Remember what Democrats tell us? Black people are too stupid poor and lazy to get an ID therefore it’s racist
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
19201 posts
Posted on 8/25/24 at 8:34 am to
Meh, EO's can be reversed. It's Congress you have to worry about
Posted by Padme
Member since Dec 2020
9256 posts
Posted on 8/25/24 at 8:35 am to
All the more reason for them to implement this. Their hypocrisy knows no bounds.
Posted by 14&Counting
Dallas, TX
Member since Jul 2012
41375 posts
Posted on 8/25/24 at 8:36 am to
Will this apply to Voter ID?

Somehow I doubt it
Posted by Padme
Member since Dec 2020
9256 posts
Posted on 8/25/24 at 8:37 am to
Of course not
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465347 posts
Posted on 8/25/24 at 8:40 am to
quote:

Will this apply to Voter ID?

Somehow I doubt it

It seems it would permit the digital IDs to be used in states that require ID

For instance, I don't know if LA Wallet can be used as ID to vote here, and this would shore that up.

I tried to use LA Wallet for a banking transaction in Mississippi once and it was not accepted. The point of these regs seems to be to clear up this issue. I imagine once there was interstate standards/verifications, there would be no reason to prevent the choice of a digital ID to be used for voting.

But, again, it would only be applicable in states that require ID. That's still based in state, not federal, law.
Posted by SingleMalt1973
Member since Feb 2022
22175 posts
Posted on 8/25/24 at 8:41 am to
Mark of the Beast

Posted by pbro62
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2016
15171 posts
Posted on 8/25/24 at 8:42 am to
frick off twit
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465347 posts
Posted on 8/25/24 at 8:42 am to
quote:


frick off twit


Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
17057 posts
Posted on 8/25/24 at 8:48 am to
EO wouldn’t hold up under the first lawsuit
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram