Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Rebalancing your portfolio

Posted on 8/17/24 at 7:45 am
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
30048 posts
Posted on 8/17/24 at 7:45 am
When I checked my portfolio this morning, I realized that my domestic/international holdings had reached 83%/17%. As a general rule, I aim to keep them at 75/25, but I’m not overly strict about it. But this spread caught my attention and got me thinking about general rebalancing philosophy, methods, etc, so I figured I would ask for the board’s thoughts on how far out of ratio is too much for your comfort, whether you sell or simply shift new investing to the underweight holding, etc, etc. These are all in tax advantaged accounts, so not worried about tax implications for any courses of action.
Posted by RoyalWe
Prairieville, LA
Member since Mar 2018
3760 posts
Posted on 8/17/24 at 8:17 am to
I don't invest internationally. If I can't get it done with the consumers and companies in the USA, then there's something seriously wrong. I get the diversification angle, but I see no need for it. The large US companies are engaging in global commerce anyway.
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
30048 posts
Posted on 8/17/24 at 8:27 am to
quote:

I don't invest internationally. If I can't get it done with the consumers and companies in the USA, then there's something seriously wrong. I get the diversification angle, but I see no need for it. The large US companies are engaging in global commerce anyway.

Then pretend instead of domestic and international I asked about equities and bond rebalancing. The purpose of this thread was to get advice on rebalancing, not on the underlying wisdom of my allocations
Posted by lynxcat
Member since Jan 2008
24737 posts
Posted on 8/17/24 at 9:04 am to
Rebalance once a year in tax advantaged if you want to keep a strict strategy in play. I don’t think any more frequently is helpful.
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
30048 posts
Posted on 8/17/24 at 9:13 am to
quote:

Rebalance once a year in tax advantaged if you want to keep a strict strategy in play. I don’t think any more frequently is helpful.

I don’t think I would consider doing it more frequently. But that still leaves the question of whether one should doggedly rebalance, or whether to leave a bit of slack in the line. And then when rebalancing, do so in a moment or just shift new investment percentages until the accounts have balanced back out?
Posted by CougarBait
on catnip in a cougar's den
Member since Jun 2007
2010 posts
Posted on 8/17/24 at 9:50 am to

Rebalancing is selling the good stuff to buy more under performers. Sometimes that may be necessary but shouldn’t be automatic, in my opinion.
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
30048 posts
Posted on 8/17/24 at 9:57 am to
In the context of individual equities, I would agree. In the context of regions of the world, there tends to be ebb and flow over time. US domestics have exploded in the last decade. Doesn’t necessarily mean that will always be the case, all the time.
Posted by RoyalWe
Prairieville, LA
Member since Mar 2018
3760 posts
Posted on 8/17/24 at 11:21 am to
I rebalance every quarter.

I value cost average using a bond fund and a stock fund. This strategy draws bond fund money into stocks as stocks underperform and moves money from stocks to bonds as stocks overperform.

You can choose ETFs relative to your risk tolerance. I have a high risk tolerance and mostly used TQQQ and AGG.

It's worked for me. I retired in my early 50s with more money than I ever thought possible.
Posted by IbalLSUfaninVA
Alexandria
Member since Jul 2008
3518 posts
Posted on 8/17/24 at 12:55 pm to
If it’s out of line with your goal then rebalance. I have been hearing it’s better to rebalance also within each asset class.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram