- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Clark: Pels open to BI extension, but not at max
Posted on 5/12/24 at 11:16 am to duyp
Posted on 5/12/24 at 11:16 am to duyp
The problem with adding a guy like Jones is you're basically shelving Jose and Daniels at the PG position. Will they actually risk that by bringing in another guy who should be getting 25ppg at the position?
From the fan perspective it makes a lot of sense but will the front office feel the same way?
From the fan perspective it makes a lot of sense but will the front office feel the same way?
Posted on 5/12/24 at 11:27 am to supe12sta12z
quote:
The problem with adding a guy like Jones is you're basically shelving Jose and Daniels at the PG position
I don't see the problem. Jose is what Jose is. Dyson, on the other hand, is a very versatile piece, particularly if he can clean up his outside shot (drop the damn off foot, Dyson). The guy can guard 1-5. I just don't see him being a PG or bust situation
Posted on 5/12/24 at 11:52 am to supe12sta12z
quote:
The problem with adding a guy like Jones is you're basically shelving Jose and Daniels at the PG position.
Dyson isn't a point guard
Jose isn't playable in the playoffs
Dyson has to take a HUGE leap next year to project as serviceable. He's much closer to bust status.
Posted on 5/12/24 at 2:54 pm to supe12sta12z
quote:
The problem with adding a guy like Jones is you're basically shelving Jose and Daniels at the PG position. Will they actually risk that by bringing in another guy who should be getting 25ppg at the position?
From the fan perspective it makes a lot of sense but will the front office feel the same way?
Absolutely this. We should only trade for a PG if the guy is a bonafide star.
Posted on 5/12/24 at 2:57 pm to supe12sta12z
quote:Jose isn't a starter, he's a backup PG.
The problem with adding a guy like Jones is you're basically shelving Jose and Daniels at the PG position
With Dyson, I think it's pretty obvious he'll never be a true point guard. It's not just that he's not good at the things that would make a good offensive point guard and can improve on them, it's that his entire game is basically anti true point guard.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News