Started By
Message

re: Clark: Pels open to BI extension, but not at max

Posted on 5/12/24 at 9:39 am to
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
14669 posts
Posted on 5/12/24 at 9:39 am to
If you have the opportunity to keep him on a super low deal like that you do it 100 times out of 100.

There’s absolutely no downside to it, and being it’s a long term contract for very good money he immediately becomes one of if not the best trade asset in the NBA
Posted by 50_Tiger
Dallas TX
Member since Jan 2016
40336 posts
Posted on 5/12/24 at 9:45 am to
quote:

There’s absolutely no downside to it


Are we just going to ignore BKM's inside reporting or ?
Posted by mhasen1
Texas
Member since Feb 2008
1745 posts
Posted on 5/12/24 at 10:43 am to
quote:

on a super low deal


WTF?

35 million isn't super low for a 1 time all star. The idea that Ingram should get more than what Mikal Bridges and Dejounte Murray extended for is simply ludicrous.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111288 posts
Posted on 5/12/24 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

There’s absolutely no downside to it
This is false for a bunch of reasons.

If it fails, every year you kept him is a failed year.


You commit to never learning Trey's true value, and he'll always just be an ok role player. We'll never know if he can be a high level player, once the extension is signed Trey is screwed.


We also lose the ability to make a trade now to get the head start on the future.


Just too many reasons to not keep him. We know it won't work, so the realistic dollar amount is irrelevant.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram