- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted on 5/11/24 at 2:14 pm to MOT
Posted on 5/11/24 at 2:14 pm to MOT
quote:
You can’t possibly look at the picture in your post and think it resembles the Maryland play in any way.
I’m clearly talking over some of yalls heads. Either I’m not explaining things well or people on here have trouble juggling multivariate, nuanced arguments. Probably a bit of both.
We are unlikely to find another scenario with exactly the same factors and there are multiple facets to consider with this rule. It’s easier to find precedence for each specific factor.
Some people were arguing that the throw had to be accurate or on the line to be considered interference. The Maryland example shows that is clearly not the case. That’s all I was trying to say.
I think myself and others provided examples to make a case for why the circumstance of last night should have been called interference. You guys have every right to disagree. The reality is it doesn’t matter. Let’s move on and have a great day!
This post was edited on 5/11/24 at 2:16 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News