- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: WB to Release First New ‘Lord of the Rings’ Movie ‘The Hunt for Gollum’ in 2026
Posted on 5/9/24 at 10:10 am to Esquire
Posted on 5/9/24 at 10:10 am to Esquire
quote:
It’s not worth a movie. It’s worth two apparently. This happened at the beginning of Fellowship between Bilbo’s party and Gandalf returning and throwing the ring in the fire to read the glyphs.
It was 17 years between Bilbo's birthday and when Gandalf returned to confirm his suspicions about the Ring. That's the problem created by the movies (which I love) in that they make it seem like it was only a short time afterwards (less than a year).
3
Posted on 5/9/24 at 10:16 am to udtiger
When is that dog shite Rings of Power show coming back? 
And they’re just money hungry with this movie. The Hobbit films were bland enough.
And they’re just money hungry with this movie. The Hobbit films were bland enough. This post was edited on 5/9/24 at 10:17 am
Posted on 5/9/24 at 10:20 am to udtiger
quote:
That's the problem created by the movies (which I love) in that they make it seem like it was only a short time afterwards (less than a year).
Yeah but that’s not too big of an issue. It’s believable that Gandalf was gone for five years between those two times, and that timeline still works.
Posted on 5/9/24 at 11:19 am to udtiger
quote:
It was 17 years between Bilbo's birthday and when Gandalf returned to confirm his suspicions about the Ring. That's the problem created by the movies (which I love) in that they make it seem like it was only a short time afterwards (less than a year).
That's definitely something that non book readers wouldn't realize but I actually didn't mind that change. It added to the urgency of the journey. In the book by that point Frodo had essentially forgotten about it, whereas in the movie the tension and urgency was still here. I'm all for changing the source as little as possible, but I thought that was a good change.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News