Started By
Message

re: Beatles or Stones?

Posted on 5/9/24 at 12:39 am to
Posted by DeltaTigerDelta
Member since Jan 2017
11405 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 12:39 am to
Stones. They pulled much better trim and longevity-wise the Beatles were a flash in the pan.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33738 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 11:11 am to
quote:

Stones. They pulled much better trim
That is highly debatable. The Beatles absolutely plowed their way through the world. Your statement sounds like it's based on choice of spouses, which is not the proper metric.

quote:

longevity-wise the Beatles were a flash in the pan.
On a quality-adjusted basis, the Beatles were of about the same career duration as the Stones. Sure, the Stones were together to put out Steel Wheels. You can have it.
Posted by SteelerBravesDawg
Member since Sep 2020
35712 posts
Posted on 5/10/24 at 7:39 am to
quote:

the Beatles were a flash in the pan

Posted by TexTigah81
Member since Nov 2013
550 posts
Posted on 5/10/24 at 8:56 am to
quote:

Beatles were a flash in the pan.

LOL…The Beatles have sold more records than The Stones and Led Zeppelin combined in that 8 year “flash”. Pretty successful “flash”. Also, Lennon, McCartney & Harrison all had #1 albums in their solo careers. Even Ringo had two #1 singles. Can’t say that about any member of the Stones or LZ. FYI… I love the Stones & LZ. Grew up listening to both every day. Saw both live at the LSU Assembly Center in the late 1970’s. Both top 5 bands of all time in my opinion. But The Beatles are the GOATS! Everyone has their own personal preferences.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram