Started By
Message

re: Would y’all be against Ramaswamy as the VP pick?

Posted on 5/7/24 at 10:48 am to
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39753 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 10:48 am to
I wouldnt hate it, but I wouldnt love it.

We need to be honest about VPs. They are largely meaningless, both to voters and to the administration.
Posted by bhtigerfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
29843 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 10:52 am to
quote:

We need to be honest about VPs. They are largely meaningless, both to voters and to the administration
I agree, VP’s are mostly chosen to hopefully carry the state where they are from, and to be an attack dog.

Vivek is easily the most articulate candidate out there and can get the message of a conservative candidate out there. I think he would be a fantastic VP candidate.
Posted by chili pup
Member since Sep 2011
3184 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

They are largely meaningless, both to voters and to the administration.


Yes. They are no more than riding the bench as a pinch hitter until they happen to be needed to fill a void of Commander in Chief.
This post was edited on 5/7/24 at 12:01 pm
Posted by 3deadtrolls
lafayette
Member since Jan 2014
5801 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

We need to be honest about VPs. They are largely meaningless, both to voters and to the administration.


That’s usually the case, but maybe not this year when both major candidates are this old.
Posted by cyarrr
Prairieville
Member since Jun 2017
3398 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

We need to be honest about VPs. They are largely meaningless, both to voters and to the administration.


Most elections yes, this year not so much considering the age of both candidates and what’s at stake.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram