Started By
Message

re: Ancient civilizations. Y or N?

Posted on 5/5/24 at 3:44 pm to
Posted by MikeD
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
7321 posts
Posted on 5/5/24 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

Hancock has said about the flood and rising sea levels is worth considering as well, 80% of humans live close to the ocean. If something existed, it would be ocean floor now.


Listen to that Rogan program, there has been extensive underwater exploration and all evidence discovered points to hunter gatherer settlements and nothing ‘advanced’
Posted by SpartanSoul
Member since Aug 2016
888 posts
Posted on 5/5/24 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

Listen to that Rogan program, there has been extensive underwater exploration and all evidence discovered points to hunter gatherer settlements and nothing ‘advanced’


There have been over 100 what we think were cities found but I wouldn't say "extensive" exploration has been done. Most of what we know about have been in the Mediterranean and have been relatively shallow and from what I would call recent on the geological timescale. We don't know if there are more that have been totally buried in silt or by tectonic movements or just too deep for our current technology. It is frequently said we know more about the surface of the moon than the seabed.

What we have found are still not well researched due to how hard it is to work underwater, currents move and destroy artifacts, sedimentation buries things beyond our ability to excavate them and the seawater destroys metals.

All of this just illustrates the point made in the first post. All of the experts were so sure they had it figured out and then Gobeki Tepe was discovered and reset the status quo. It would be hubris of a high order to think similar discoveries aren't waiting to reset the status quo in the future.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61674 posts
Posted on 5/5/24 at 6:00 pm to
quote:

Listen to that Rogan program, there has been extensive underwater exploration and all evidence discovered points to hunter gatherer settlements and nothing ‘advanced’


They both seemed too close minded on the issue. We can both be doing a good job of deciding where to look and still miss things because the world is a big place and a lot of the places ancient civilizations may be are not that accessible today.

What I don’t get is how these 2 opposing forces don’t work together. What is stopping them from looking in more places is more funding. Hancock creates interest in the topic and more interest usually can lead to more money. This debate on Rogan was way better for archaeology than the silliness of trying to get Hancock’s show cancelled.
This post was edited on 5/5/24 at 6:01 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram