- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jack Smith and His DOJ Comrades are Staring at and Accused of Evidence Tampering
Posted on 5/4/24 at 11:46 am to ChineseBandit58
Posted on 5/4/24 at 11:46 am to ChineseBandit58
It kind of is. It's one thing to have uncovered documents in your possession and alerting the DoJ to the fact. It's another thing to ostensibly comply with a subpoena, say you have turned over documents and then have it uncovered that you knew you did not turn them all over and then by omitting that force another person , namely your lawyer to then attest to something that you know to be mostly to patently untrue. .
You do realize , of course you do, that Sandy Berger was prosecuted for docs in the socks and worked out a plea deal with the Bush DoJ.....or did you plan to omit that from your argument?
We're down to one, Bandit, and we largely agree about the abuse and FISA
But that does not mean that Trump should be considered lily white clean in this matter. He fricked around with a legit federal subpoena that his own lawyers told him that if you do not turn in everything and you certify that you did, it could be considered a crime.
You do realize , of course you do, that Sandy Berger was prosecuted for docs in the socks and worked out a plea deal with the Bush DoJ.....or did you plan to omit that from your argument?
We're down to one, Bandit, and we largely agree about the abuse and FISA
But that does not mean that Trump should be considered lily white clean in this matter. He fricked around with a legit federal subpoena that his own lawyers told him that if you do not turn in everything and you certify that you did, it could be considered a crime.
Posted on 5/4/24 at 11:58 am to KiwiHead
quote:
But that does not mean that Trump should be considered lily white clean in this matter. He fricked around with a legit federal subpoena that his own lawyers told him that if you do not turn in everything and you certify that you did, it could be considered a crime.
The current president took classified documents and put them in his fricking garage when he wasn’t even president.
Posted on 5/7/24 at 6:00 am to KiwiHead
quote:You take multiple liberties with assumptions there, none of which may be true
It's one thing to have uncovered documents in your possession and alerting the DoJ to the fact. It's another thing to ostensibly comply with a subpoena, say you have turned over documents and then have it uncovered that you knew you did not turn them all over and then by omitting that force another person , namely your lawyer to then attest to something that you know to be mostly to patently untrue. .
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)