- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Opponents to ask for rehearing in St. George matter
Posted on 5/1/24 at 2:00 pm to LSUFanHouston
Posted on 5/1/24 at 2:00 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
What would seem fair to me would be to say, ok, this is how much tax dollars were earned in the area, subtract the value of services rec'd, and they are owed the rest
Yes, that seems very fair; however, they already spent the money on other things.
How can you claw back and take money from the FD pension fund, the civic giveaway at the community center, or the turning lane added to make traffic around some fat cats house flow better?
2
Posted on 5/1/24 at 2:01 pm to doubleb
quote:
How can you claw back and take money from the FD pension fund, the civic giveaway at the community center, or the turning lane added to make traffic around some fat cats house flow better?
Earmark money going forward in BR’s budget to be paid to St George.
Doesn’t have to be all at once but going “Lol, don’t have it” isn’t a sufficient defense.
Posted on 5/1/24 at 2:03 pm to doubleb
quote:
How can you claw back and take money from the FD pension fund, the civic giveaway at the community center, or the turning lane added to make traffic around some fat cats house flow better?
Lack of accountability got us this mess.
As far as I am concerned, they can float a bond and let the remaining taxpayers - the ones who benefitted from money that was not theirs - pay the bond back.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News