Started By
Message

re: Unsealed FBI agent testimony in the documents case paints picture of Trump being set up

Posted on 4/29/24 at 3:36 pm to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
424615 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

Immediately prior to the raid, Trump's attorneys were in discussions with the archives about what they needed and how they wanted it protected.

That doesn't answer my question.
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
64366 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 4:37 pm to
Why did Jack Smith redact this in the first place, if it's so harmless and normal and standard operating procedure?
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
13577 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

That doesn't answer my question.


One of his lawyers at the time stated they had sent documents requested back and they had "descriptions" of requests for other items. Which is bullshite they are all numbered.

For those, Trump's lawyer said we need specifics, the last thing we want is to send the wrong thing from their "description" and be charged with non compliance. Because of the delay.......they charged them with non compliance.

Its a mute point, they were declassified and there is no retro active DOD "super duper classified", nor can you take the presidents clearance after the fact and make it retroactive.

All nonsense just like the rest, but lets get past the fact and start to argue minutia.

I, like justice Thomas, want to know how a "special counsel" can be set up without congress voting on it? And with good reason, it can result in exactly what is happening a witch hunt by the person in office against an opponent. He is right to ask that question, very right.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram