- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Andrew Weissmann's intentional ignorance on checks and balances.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 4:38 pm to NC_Tigah
Posted on 4/29/24 at 4:38 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Perhaps go back and read insistences that the "Constitution says" certain things and we can square your "circular" in a quick minute.
I don't even know what you're talking about frankly, at least not relative to my posts. To the extent I used that phrase at all ITT, it was earlier in the thread when Robin Masters was woefully and demonstrably wrong about the impeachment judgment clause.
But then again, I'm not the one arguing that the impeachment clauses in the Constitution differentiate between POTUS and other impeachable officers--when it doesn't--simply because I want it to differentiate between them, as you are.
This post was edited on 4/29/24 at 4:43 pm
2
Posted on 4/29/24 at 4:44 pm to Indefatigable
quote:You've not posted that much here. However, when supporting others who are forwarding questionable viewpoints, as in this instance, you may get called on that.
at least not relative to my posts.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 4:55 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
To the extent I used that phrase at all ITT, it was earlier in the thread when Robin Masters was woefully and demonstrably wrong about the impeachment judgment clause.
Do you have a mole at the USSC? They are deciding on that argument as we type? Curious what makes you so sure. Especially considering their willingness to hear the case?
quote:
Sauer told the justices that presidents could only face criminal charges once they are impeached and convicted in the Senate. At the same time, he said such a prosecution could only happen under criminal statutes that make a “clear statement” to explicitly include the president.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News