- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Andrew Weissmann's intentional ignorance on checks and balances.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 3:07 pm to NC_Tigah
Posted on 4/29/24 at 3:07 pm to NC_Tigah
Alexander Hamilton again from the top rope:
Federalist 77
quote:
The answer to this question has been anticipated in the investigation of its other characteristics, and is satisfactorily deducible from these circumstances; from the election of the President once in four years by persons immediately chosen by the people for that purpose; and from his being at all times liable to impeachment, trial, dismission from office, incapacity to serve in any other, and to forfeiture of life and estate by subsequent prosecution in the common course of law.
Federalist 77
2
Posted on 4/29/24 at 3:26 pm to Robin Masters
quote:But, but, but, but ... that implies a different treatment for the POTUS vs a no-name federal judge??? Oh my. How totally unexpected.
Alexander Hamilton again from the top rope:
Posted on 4/29/24 at 3:42 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
by subsequent prosecution in the common course of law.
Again, that says nothing that we aren't arguing, first of all.
Secondly, that isn't in the Constitution.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News