- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Andrew Weissmann's intentional ignorance on checks and balances.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 12:37 pm to Indefatigable
Posted on 4/29/24 at 12:37 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Removing the VPOTUS from the equation
Same idea as to why it wouldn’t be wise to have VPOTUS be the officeholder where election certification bottlenecks, right?
3
Posted on 4/29/24 at 12:39 pm to boosiebadazz
Posting that case made things real quiet.
I thank Robin Masters for the biggest self-own on the poli board in some time, for linking it (thinking it supported his side).
I mean I found the case example, but had no idea the actual ruling was so strong for my side (even my Double Jeopardy argument).
I thank Robin Masters for the biggest self-own on the poli board in some time, for linking it (thinking it supported his side).
I mean I found the case example, but had no idea the actual ruling was so strong for my side (even my Double Jeopardy argument).
Posted on 4/29/24 at 12:40 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Same idea as to why it wouldn’t be wise to have VPOTUS be the officeholder where election certification bottlenecks, right?
My position on Pence’s inability to do anything other than open envelopes is well documented in my post history
Posted on 4/29/24 at 1:40 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:and yet, we do.
Same idea as to why it wouldn’t be wise to have VPOTUS be the officeholder where election certification bottlenecks, right?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News