You cannot be serious. How did the tents in Jackson Square impact public safety? I anticipate a laughing emoji with no actual response because we both know they didn’t. The impenetrable walls of tents and tables on the neutral ground posed a public safety risk by preventing the public from accessing the neutral ground or moving away from it. When there was a shooting a couple of years ago during a parade, people couldn’t run away because of the tents and tables. We both know you don’t even know what I’m talking about because you’re most likely too afraid to come to a Mardi Gras parade in New Orleans.

You really have no idea what you’re talking about. You just don’t want people to exercise their constitutional rights unless they are white boomers storming the capital wearing MAGA hats.

ETA: making this issue about who you would rather hang out with is making an emotional appeal and I’m not interested in your feelings.

This post was edited on 4/29/24 at 1:13 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Bard

Definitely NOT an admin

Member since Oct 2008

51877 posts

Posted on 4/29/24 at 1:35 pm to 4cubbies

quote:
ETA: making this issue about who you would rather hang out with is making an emotional appeal and I’m not interested in your feelings.

Your point was safety. I asked which group you would feel more safe around. You are failing to answer that because you realize it would expose the weakness of your argument. The only emotion here is your fear of admitting your point was crap.

quote:
How did the tents in Jackson Square impact public safety?

Their purpose is to intimidate others into joining their cause. That's enough of a safety right off the bat, furthermore it's far more of a concern than people camping in the neutral ground.

quote:
You just don’t want people to exercise their constitutional rights unless they are white boomers storming the capital wearing MAGA hats.

quote:
We both know you don’t even know what I’m talking about because you’re most likely too afraid to come to a Mardi Gras parade in New Orleans.

Thank you for proving my point. Someone explains how your stance is emotionally-driven hyperbolic claptrap and you somehow thing devolving into a nonsensical rant about constitutional freedoms and boomers and make wild, ignorant accusations of others is a competent response built on sound reason.

Or, to shorten it down, someone called your stance emotional and you got emotional to prove you aren't the one being emotional. For that, you definitely get the laughing emoji.