- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: New York Judge Says 2nd Amendment 'Doesn't Exist in This Courtroom'
Posted on 4/24/24 at 8:41 am to Vacherie Saint
Posted on 4/24/24 at 8:41 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
To say a primary constitutional right "doesnt exist" in your jurisdiction is grounds for removal.
I have to imagine this slanted article is using quotes to further that slant.
Was there already a ruling on the applicability of 2A or a motion in limine about referencing it? The article does not say b/c it's shitty. I got 5 SFP dollars that the judge's comments reference something along those lines, where a ruling was already made and the "it doesn't exist here" comment meant within the trial context.
If I'm correct, the judges ruling will be part of the post-trial appeal. If the judge is wrong, the case gets sent back and they re-do the trial "with the 2A existing in the courtroom".
Posted on 4/24/24 at 9:09 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Was there already a ruling on the applicability of 2A
Yes. It's called the Constitution, my friend.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 9:19 am to SlowFlowPro
while we all appreciate, and have come to expect, you running cover for this judge, its hard to argue context with a direct quote like:
Everything you said makes sense until the judge says "This is New York".
quote:
‘Do not bring the Second Amendment into this courtroom. It doesn’t exist here. So you can’t argue Second Amendment. This is New York.'
Everything you said makes sense until the judge says "This is New York".
Posted on 4/24/24 at 9:32 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Was there already a ruling on the applicability of 2A or a motion in limine about referencing it? The article does not say b/c it's shitty. I got 5 SFP dollars that the judge's comments reference something along those lines, where a ruling was already made and the "it doesn't exist here" comment meant within the trial context.
Let's assume that's the case. Do you not see a problem with said ruling?
Posted on 4/24/24 at 11:58 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Was there already a ruling on the applicability of 2A
Posted on 4/24/24 at 12:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
It won't go back to that court. She doesn't get a redo.....because she's stupid
She displays a common trait of the left from NY.
There is no slant. Another example of stupid from the left.
It's simple...This will get tossed if the Supreme Court decides "Ghost guns' are legal. Ghost gun is simple, no serial number. So the Supreme Court has to decide .....Did the guns in the Revlutiary War
She displays a common trait of the left from NY.
There is no slant. Another example of stupid from the left.
It's simple...This will get tossed if the Supreme Court decides "Ghost guns' are legal. Ghost gun is simple, no serial number. So the Supreme Court has to decide .....Did the guns in the Revlutiary War
Posted on 4/24/24 at 12:35 pm to SlowFlowPro
Nothing is "Slanted"
She is a stupid liberal judge and will lose her ruling ......all because she's an idiot from New York, looking like two other idiots in New York.
The "Ghost Gun" case will be heard this fall. His case will be wrapped up in the final decisions concerning this debate on Ghost Guns. Texas had decided that Ghost guns were legal. Biden stepped in it again and decided, "no they aren't" An entire industry waits for the court.
Exactly who determines the legality of a gun by a serial number? Other laws cover what is being claimed here. You can modify a hand gun to fire like an automatic. You can modify a long gun to do the same .....I think it comes down to whether of not the modification is deemed legal or not
The Supreme Court will decide this fall.
At the time of sale ......all the parts were deemed legal ....
She is a stupid liberal judge and will lose her ruling ......all because she's an idiot from New York, looking like two other idiots in New York.
The "Ghost Gun" case will be heard this fall. His case will be wrapped up in the final decisions concerning this debate on Ghost Guns. Texas had decided that Ghost guns were legal. Biden stepped in it again and decided, "no they aren't" An entire industry waits for the court.
Exactly who determines the legality of a gun by a serial number? Other laws cover what is being claimed here. You can modify a hand gun to fire like an automatic. You can modify a long gun to do the same .....I think it comes down to whether of not the modification is deemed legal or not
The Supreme Court will decide this fall.
At the time of sale ......all the parts were deemed legal ....
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News