Started By
Message

re: Non-Compete agreements are now illegal nationwide!

Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:13 pm to
Posted by spacewrangler
In my easy chair with my boots on..
Member since Sep 2009
9750 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:13 pm to
quote:

It's not overreach if private corporations won't stop this willingly.



Why should a private company have to willingly stop requiring a NCC as part of their hiring conditions?

Posted by #1RagleyTiger
Ragley La
Member since Dec 2021
11 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:13 pm to
Monumental shift coming in the equipment rental business, about time the big guys like UR,SB,HR& HE stop bullying the sales reps that build the relationships and bring the revenue to the company.
Posted by ColdTurkey
Where the Buffalo roam...
Member since Nov 2019
7634 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:28 pm to
Yeah that'll last all of 15 minutes in Louisiana. I witnessed first hand a few weeks ago just how bought and paid for our state legislative body is, and its filthy beyond what I ever expected. Go a few rungs up, I am sure it's even worse.
Posted by WyattDonnelly
Member since Feb 2024
207 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:32 pm to
The FTC can’t make laws so they’re not “illegal” yet. They will still have to be challenged in court. These administrative agencies have gone completely out of control.
Posted by PGAOLDBawNeVaBroke
Member since Dec 2023
807 posts
Posted on 4/28/24 at 9:05 pm to
Good lord for the 10th time the FTC and Clayton Act has been passed and is LAW
Posted by Lsutigerturner
Member since Dec 2016
5836 posts
Posted on 4/28/24 at 9:18 pm to
That’s the part of post and job perks, read the fine print and sign or don’t but you can’t renege.


Blows my mind that govt can outright outlaw this…..
Posted by PGAOLDBawNeVaBroke
Member since Dec 2023
807 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 11:00 pm to
lol read it again buddy. He’s not making policy decisions, your noncompete is toast.
Posted by NPComb
Member since Jan 2019
27484 posts
Posted on 4/30/24 at 12:58 am to
There will be a ton of espionage and more patent stealing.
Posted by WyattDonnelly
Member since Feb 2024
207 posts
Posted on 4/30/24 at 1:45 am to
Oh you must mean this FTC rule or new “LAW”!

. LINK. Just because the FTC says so does not make it a law. Companies trying to protect intellectual property and customers will have their day in court over this. Agencies can’t make laws.
This post was edited on 4/30/24 at 1:49 am
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
64752 posts
Posted on 4/30/24 at 2:02 am to
You: “I’m not ok with the federal government getting between an agreement between two consenting adults.

Also you

quote:

Laws, you mean as those passed by a legislature? Because that isn't what this thread is about. Granted, if you are aware of an act of congress authorizing the FTC to do this, I am all ears.


You can’t argue your point without contradicting yourself.
This post was edited on 4/30/24 at 3:06 am
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
64752 posts
Posted on 4/30/24 at 2:04 am to
quote:

Oh you must mean this FTC rule or new “LAW”!


The Clayton Act is part of an 1914 law, idiot.
Posted by PGAOLDBawNeVaBroke
Member since Dec 2023
807 posts
Posted on 4/30/24 at 4:24 pm to
This is not about NDAs bud
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
30279 posts
Posted on 4/30/24 at 5:34 pm to
quote:

It's not really consensual though. People signed them because they had to, to get the job.


I'm sure some of the people using this argument to support government's meddling into private contracts also supported the government's overreach during the COVID farce by saying that the people who got the jab to keep their jobs did it consensually.
Jump to page
Page First 10 11 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 12 of 12Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram