- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 4/20/24 at 3:55 pm to Revelator
quote:
How is this a felony?
LITERALLLY explained, step by step, in the post you replied to
quote:
The trial is trying to piece together the most logical explanation of how and why, based on evidence to be introduced at trial.
Ultimately this trial boils down to 2 possibilities.
1. Cohen committed fraud and stole the money from Trump' company (and didn't keep the stolen money and paid Stormy/CPL for...reasons)
2. Cohen facilitated and obfuscated payments to Stormy/CPL from a company Trump owned.
If 1 is shown to be more likely, the case is over, even though it could still technically violate the law.
If 2 is shown to be more likely, THEN the jury has to compare that behavior within the wacky NY business records law
If the jury then finds this behavior violated the law, THEN they have to consider the implications on the campaign (or else it's s prescribed misdemeanor charge)
Posted on 4/20/24 at 3:56 pm to MrLSU
quote:
Avenatti, Daniels, and Cohen all testifying that Stormy Daniels had an affair with Cohen not Trump and they tried to extort Trump by planting the story is going to add fuel to the fire there is no question about it.
The trial isn't just about Stormy, though. That's the problem with this theory.
So Coehn banged Stormy AND Karen McDougal (who wasn't represented by CPL)? And Cohen defrauded Trump only to....pay Stormy and McDougal?
Doesn't make any sense
Posted on 4/20/24 at 4:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
That’s what I thought. They are basically trying a novel approach and making it up as they go, hoping since they have a sympathetic jury, they can make anything stick, no matter how convoluted.
Posted on 4/20/24 at 4:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Too bad after over 400,000 posts you are still batting .000.
I just enjoy posting on the internet with the ancillary benefit of proving people wrong
So, then why do you continue to post here?
This post was edited on 4/20/24 at 6:20 pm
Posted on 4/20/24 at 4:59 pm to TigerFred
quote:Is this true?
You showed up at all the early TD meet ups to let everyone know that you were the “best” poster around. When people didn’t give a shite, you got mad.
OMG, that’s absolutely hilarious….though not the least bit surprising.
Posted on 4/20/24 at 5:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
I notice you didn’t respond to the fact the NY law has never been used this way and the statute of limitations had passed anyway. You are intellectually dishonest.
Posted on 4/20/24 at 5:25 pm to loogaroo
I understood Avenatti much better after watching the special about the kid who collected all those pepsi points for the harrier jet.
Posted on 4/20/24 at 5:29 pm to loogaroo
It's hard to know who to trust anymore. A pornstar, a lawyer for a pornstar, or Trump.
Posted on 4/20/24 at 5:31 pm to Drizzt
quote:
I notice you didn’t respond to the fact the NY law has never been used this way
It's a very broad law. I described it as "Wacky" multiple times in this very thread.
quote:
and the statute of limitations had passed anyway.
I already covered this directly.
quote:
You are intellectually dishonest.
You can't read, apparently
Posted on 4/20/24 at 5:35 pm to GusAU
quote:
Is this true?
No.
I actually have a witness who could vouch who posts here
In fact, not long after the first OTGT I went to, a weekly OT pickup basketball game formed that I played in for years.
Fred was not invited.
However, I will tell you some old OT lore from that night that is true and makes me look bad. The primary reason I went was to hook up with a female poster that I had been talking to offline......and she ended up getting back together with her midget ex-bf instead
This post was edited on 4/20/24 at 5:36 pm
Posted on 4/20/24 at 5:44 pm to GusAU
Ohh it’s Very true.
He thinks that the ridiculous amount of posts, most are bullshite, means something in real life.
He thinks that the ridiculous amount of posts, most are bullshite, means something in real life.
Posted on 4/20/24 at 5:54 pm to TigerFred
quote:
Ohh it’s Very true.
Didn't happen.
Which one are you misremembering, specifically.
Again, you may be mixing me up with iluv's mom.
quote:
He thinks that the ridiculous amount of posts, most are bullshite, means something in real life.
Your psychoanalysis is worse than your memory
Posted on 4/20/24 at 6:10 pm to GusAU
quote:
SFP quote:
I just enjoy posting on the internet with the ancillary benefit of proving people wrong
quote:
Too bad after over 400,000 posts you are still battling .000.
So, then why do you continue to post here?
WAIT WAIT!! ...That .000 is now .0012!
SFP just beat out a dribbler in front of the plate by a hair at first!...
(Uh-oh. Nevermind. The replay Official Scorer just changed it to an E-2)
smdh
Posted on 4/20/24 at 6:37 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I really feel bad for people like him who have to pretend they're a big deal even after being disgraced and being imprisoned for 10+ years in jail.
Dude's mental.
Yall were loving this dude and trying to promote him as a potential presidential candidate when it was 24/7 OMB.
Posted on 4/20/24 at 6:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That's a question only for the loyalists who pretend he didn't.
Do you have proof he did dumb shite???
Posted on 4/20/24 at 6:40 pm to Prettyboy Floyd
quote:
Do you have proof he did dumb shite???
Proof? No.
Evidence and logic to make an educated analysis? Yes.
Posted on 4/20/24 at 6:41 pm to Prettyboy Floyd
quote:
Yall were loving this dude
Do you have proof I did [ad hom deleted] ?
Posted on 4/20/24 at 6:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Evidence and logic to make an educated analysis? Yes.
Like I said, no factual evidence to it ever happening.
Just your delusions
Posted on 4/20/24 at 6:42 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Do you have proof I did [ad hom deleted] ?
Yes
I don't need proof - It just sounds exactly like you.
See how that works
Page 6 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News