- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Simple question: Why is Ukraine’s border more important than ours?
Posted on 4/18/24 at 12:57 pm to Indefatigable
Posted on 4/18/24 at 12:57 pm to Indefatigable
Okay, here:
You’re going to have to define “it” in the context of international law that our Congress has approved making it the law of our land. Specifically laws regarding those people crossing international borders seeking asylum.
quote:
Well the total lack of addressing it
You’re going to have to define “it” in the context of international law that our Congress has approved making it the law of our land. Specifically laws regarding those people crossing international borders seeking asylum.
3
Posted on 4/18/24 at 12:58 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
Is it legal to cross the border 12 countries away to seek asylum?
You people can frick off with the asylum bullshite.
You people can frick off with the asylum bullshite.
Posted on 4/18/24 at 1:01 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
Specific to asylum-seekers, reinstating the Remain in Mexico policy would be a start.
But the "it" is broader than that. The willful admittance of illegals into the country at and between ports of entry is something that Congress absolutely can address. It is something the WH and DHS can also absolutely address. Instead, illegal crossings are incentivized.
To the extent that any of the foregoing doesn't comply with whatever international law has been incorporated into our domestic law, that can also be addressed. It isn't, because it is politically expedient to continue allowing the problem to continue unabated.
But the "it" is broader than that. The willful admittance of illegals into the country at and between ports of entry is something that Congress absolutely can address. It is something the WH and DHS can also absolutely address. Instead, illegal crossings are incentivized.
To the extent that any of the foregoing doesn't comply with whatever international law has been incorporated into our domestic law, that can also be addressed. It isn't, because it is politically expedient to continue allowing the problem to continue unabated.
Posted on 4/18/24 at 1:53 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
You’re going to have to define “it” in the context of international law that our Congress has approved making it the law of our land. Specifically laws regarding those people crossing international borders seeking asylum.
I love it. Why isn’t the Biden admin detaining those who seek asylum. That is perfectly legal and would act as a huge deterrent to the flood coming across the border. As I said…enforce the current laws.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News