Started By
Message

re: To what extent would LSU be more prestigious if it were in a safer location?

Posted on 4/16/24 at 3:31 pm to
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79414 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 3:31 pm to
I don't think it'd be more prestigious, at least at first.

But I do think a nicer town/state would obviously lift it somewhat. It's a nice campus, it seems timeless in part. Sometimes the academic prestige follows other appeal.

SMU was a landing spot for rich kids well before the academic acclaim really caught up to it. I think you could make the argument that LSU would get a few more destination students if you picked it up and put it a nicer place, and in turn, it would see some eventual rise in standards/prestige.
Posted by HouseMom
Member since Jun 2020
1027 posts
Posted on 4/16/24 at 5:45 pm to
quote:

I think you could make the argument that LSU would get a few more destination students if you picked it up and put it a nicer place, and in turn, it would see some eventual rise in standards/prestige.


I completely agree. While LSU has made some strides in the Nicholson area, for example, BR is still a dump and getting worse in many ways. Go visit a functioning city and then come back home.

Our "leaders" can't even get the roads painted in many areas. You notice a lot of this teaching a teenager to drive. "Okay, now follow the line on the double left turn." "Mom, I don't see a line." All while trying to avoid a crackhead teetering into the street. SMH

Starting to think we all have Stockholm syndrome
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram