Started By
Message

re: "Conservatism" has to be more than just a defensive posture

Posted on 4/15/24 at 10:50 am to
Posted by wutangfinancial
Treasure Valley
Member since Sep 2015
11286 posts
Posted on 4/15/24 at 10:50 am to
quote:

We have to maintain our GDP while drastically cutting spending (which will, in turn, lower GDP, creating the need for more cuts).


You understand this is paradoxal right? Cut spending and you cut GDP. There’s a reason we calculate economic growth this way. What we really need is to grow the private sector and to stop crowding out new loan growth to small and medium sized businesses. Which is not going to happen.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
263207 posts
Posted on 4/15/24 at 10:52 am to
quote:

Cut spending and you cut GDP


Not necessarily in a booming economy.

No one has tried it in 20 years.

The GDP will have to drop to "fix" our current issue. The only other solution is massive subsidies, which kicks the can down the road.
This post was edited on 4/15/24 at 10:53 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425697 posts
Posted on 4/15/24 at 10:52 am to
quote:

You understand this is paradoxal right? Cut spending and you cut GDP.


quote:

which will, in turn, lower GDP,


Yes, I understand.

quote:

What we really need is to grow the private sector


Already covered, with napkin math.

quote:

Not really possible. Do the math and calculate what sort of GDP increase we will need (assuming no extra government spending and a return in taxers of 20% of GDP).

Every $100B in tax growth will require $500B in private sector GDP expansion. Our current deficit is $1.6T, so just to get even (ignoring the debt), our private sector GDP will have to increase what, $8T?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram