Started By
Message

re: Apparently the 4th amendment is a threat to national security.

Posted on 4/12/24 at 3:57 pm to
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112677 posts
Posted on 4/12/24 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

Is it a false equivalence when discussing the same law being re-authorized in the past?


OK, you're a bit slow. I'll try really hard to explain. The issue was 'hate speech laws'. He said both sides do it. That refers to a TACTIC, not a specific law.
Here is a simple example:
X is for killing people who murder.
Y is for killing everyone I don't like.
Me: 'Y kills more than X'
You: 'Y and X have the SAME policy for murder.'

Don't you feel really stupid?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
424741 posts
Posted on 4/12/24 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

OK, you're a bit slow. I'll try really hard to explain. The issue was 'hate speech laws'. He said both sides do it. That refers to a TACTIC, not a specific law.

Understood. I was just clarifying something he did not say.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram