Started By
Message

re: How Can You Explain OJ’s Blood Found at the Crime Scene?

Posted on 4/11/24 at 8:09 pm to
Posted by LSUFreek
Greater New Orleans
Member since Jan 2007
14798 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 8:09 pm to
The most irrefutable evidence to me is the bloody Bruno Magli shoeprints on the driver's side floorboard in OJ's crookedly-parked locked vehicle. Later tested, it had only Nicole & Ron's blood in the prints.

Even if you are blindly unreasonable & believe in a mass LAPD/Forensic conspiracy to frame OJ with tainted lab results, and/or cast suspicion on his son as the actual killer, where the frick was OJ when he was traipsing through human blood, before he started driving & parked crooked in a rush, as he admitted to police?
Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
22645 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 8:27 pm to
quote:



Even if you are blindly unreasonable & believe in a mass LAPD/Forensic conspiracy to frame OJ with tainted lab results, and



This is not a conspiracy theory. It is proven fact. Phillip Vanatter planted OJ's blood that had been treated with ETDA at the crime scene. And the prosecutors didn't give a single shite. Again, I have never doubted that OJ was the killer but ignoring what actually happened in favor of this fairytale of "black tribalism" annoys me. The jury made a reasonable decision in light of the LAPD's actions.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram