- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: ‘There was no signature verification done in Fulton County in 2020. None.’
Posted on 4/2/24 at 1:27 pm to moneyg
Posted on 4/2/24 at 1:27 pm to moneyg
Hypothetically, what does it mean if no signature verification was done.
No signature validation is a lofty charge. If this were proven to have been the case, it would have serious consequences.
In order for a mail in vote to be considered valid, the voter has to sign the ballot. I could be wrong, but I believe they also have to date and sign the envelope. Those signatures must match AND match the signature in the voting book.
The idea is that having all three match verifies three things:
1. The person mailing the vote is the same as the person casting it
2. The person casting the vote is the registered voter
3. The vote is being mailed before the deadline.
If no signature verification was done, then none of these three elements can be proven. It has already been admitted that many mail in votes were counted without envelopes, without dated envelopes (meaning they weren’t mailed) or with late dates (meaning they could have been manufactured post-election). No signature verification means that there is no way to check if these votes were even made by a person at all. One would want there to be no signature verification if they were going to duplicate ballots en-masse after polls closed to make up a deficit to flip an election. They have already admitted that contrary to law, all ballot images have been destroyed, meaning signature verification after the fact is impossible.
Basically, without signature verification, there is no way to distinguish fake ballots from real ones, let alone discover mail-in ballots meant to impersonate registered voters that were not actually cast by those people. Without signature verification, Georgia’s election never should have been certified.
No signature validation is a lofty charge. If this were proven to have been the case, it would have serious consequences.
In order for a mail in vote to be considered valid, the voter has to sign the ballot. I could be wrong, but I believe they also have to date and sign the envelope. Those signatures must match AND match the signature in the voting book.
The idea is that having all three match verifies three things:
1. The person mailing the vote is the same as the person casting it
2. The person casting the vote is the registered voter
3. The vote is being mailed before the deadline.
If no signature verification was done, then none of these three elements can be proven. It has already been admitted that many mail in votes were counted without envelopes, without dated envelopes (meaning they weren’t mailed) or with late dates (meaning they could have been manufactured post-election). No signature verification means that there is no way to check if these votes were even made by a person at all. One would want there to be no signature verification if they were going to duplicate ballots en-masse after polls closed to make up a deficit to flip an election. They have already admitted that contrary to law, all ballot images have been destroyed, meaning signature verification after the fact is impossible.
Basically, without signature verification, there is no way to distinguish fake ballots from real ones, let alone discover mail-in ballots meant to impersonate registered voters that were not actually cast by those people. Without signature verification, Georgia’s election never should have been certified.
This post was edited on 4/2/24 at 1:33 pm
Posted on 4/2/24 at 1:36 pm to kingbob
Additionally, properly-mailed ballots should have 2 creases. Many of the affidavits filed by poll workers in Fulton, Cobb, Dekalb & Gwinnett counties reported seeing ballots being scanned which were wholly unfolded. It appears that many of the stacks of ballots which were scanned multiple times by the Ruby Freeman Urban Democracy Squad had no folds. Others attest under oath that the ballot ovals were "perfectly" filled, as if done by a machine. This leads many to suspect that they were printed with votes cast for Biden.
It is not unreasonable to suspect that the Zuckerboxes which were installed in heavily blue precincts to collect the ballots may have well been delivered and installed with pre-marked ballots already inside, folded or not.
Hawaii is getting dangerous, recently passing legislation making ballot *images* equivalent to the physical ballots themselves. This means that doctored images of the ballots could be counted as legitimate votes.
It is not unreasonable to suspect that the Zuckerboxes which were installed in heavily blue precincts to collect the ballots may have well been delivered and installed with pre-marked ballots already inside, folded or not.
Hawaii is getting dangerous, recently passing legislation making ballot *images* equivalent to the physical ballots themselves. This means that doctored images of the ballots could be counted as legitimate votes.
Posted on 4/2/24 at 1:42 pm to kingbob
quote:
Hypothetically, what does it mean if no signature verification was done.
Additionally, a statistically significant number of the ballots were not creased which is indisputable evidence that the ballots were never in a mail-in ballot envelope. All Mail-in ballots must arrive in an official mail-in envelope that is signed and dated on the outside. The ballots will not fit in the envelopes unless folded. So, they were never in an official envelope and must be discarded. All this is in the Georgia voting regulations.
This evidence also indicates that the 1 of the Senate seats and possibly both senate seats lost to the DNC were actually GOP wins on the 1st ballot. So, not only did Trump likely have the most votes in Georgia but at lease 1 of the GOP Senate candidates did too, making the DNC Senate majority fraudulent.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News