re: US child deaths on the rise, partly blamed on ‘immune overreaction’

If you want to be consistent in your beliefs and not just doxastically virtue-signal to your tribe about your purity, you should do what Winston does and give up on conventional medicine and start seeing homeopaths and not just pilled-signaling docs. Conventional medicine is just not for you. All poison!

quote:

---

If you want to be consistent in your beliefs and not just doxastically virtue-signal to your tribe about your purity, you should do what Winston does and give up on conventional medicine and start seeing homeopaths or at least pilled-signaling docs. Conventional medicine is just not for you.

---

That has absolutely nothing to do with wearing a mask or its efficacy as it relates to COVID or other viruses. Your obfuscation is very telling.

quote:

---

I'm asking you for your reasons.

---

You didn’t ask for my reasons… baw. And you changed the subject from masks to general medicine real quick.

quote:

---

So be careful about what belief you propagandize yourself into.

---

That is solid advice!





So are you still advocating for masks? Yes or no?

It depends on where you are (indoor/outdoor, density of people, what kind of population you're around), what your risk factors are, and what your level of risk tolerance is, likelihood that you might be sick at the time.

Use judgement.

quote:

---

If masks work to prevent the spread of COVID, why didn’t masks work to prevent the spread of COVID?

---

They're not as powerful at reducing the spread of COVID as they for reducing spread of droplet-bourne infections like flu because COVID is transmitted by aerosol, so more COVID gets past a mask than flu, but whether you get infected or not is a factor of the amount of transmitted virus that you receive and masks will reduce the amount of viral particulates you breathe in and that's likely what's responsible for less transmission (not no transmission) when you mask.

The skeptic community is right that the masks are less effective than previously believed/hoped. But it was a novel disease with a new pathogen people hadn't encountered. The most logical thing was to think SARS-2 would be like SARS-1, but SARS-2 was more transmissible by aerosol.

The more vaccination the more death. We are number one.

Reaffirming a Positive Correlation Between Number of Vaccine Doses and Infant Mortality Rates



I've seen dozens of tweets reporting deaths of grade school children from heart attack or stroke. The children are dying in their sleep. The MSM says nothing.

quote:

---

But child death rates may not have improved because there is a near zero statistical chance of children dying of Covid in the first place, according to experts.

---

Almost every time there is a vaccine-hysterical thread on here I easily debunk it; this time not so much. The quoted sentence says a lot, and it’s true. There was indeed an almost zero chance of a child dying, or being severely damaged, by covid.

Almost every vaccine has some casualties, and in order to justify it, it must do a lot of good. In the case of children the good is almost zero. It was the height of foolishness for children to be vaccinated and nearly criminal that our medical establishment pushed that.

There's a lot of 20/20 hindsight stuff going on too, but yeah, libs also virtue signal in a pandemics, not just "purebloods" and "masks are for cucks" sort of stuff.