Started By
Message

re: Scanning unverified ballots multiple times

Posted on 3/24/24 at 10:08 am to
Posted by Dday63
Member since Sep 2014
2319 posts
Posted on 3/24/24 at 10:08 am to
quote:

This Forum is not totally blind, so attempts to buck up the idea that the {naked) "Emperor has no clothes", will not cut it.


But this forum clings dearly to the idea that their naked Emporer is wearing beautiful clothes.

If you want to believe the GBI, FBI, and previously faithful US Attorneys are all part of a conspiracy, then go right ahead.

But the question was why has no one "brought charges against these people and forced them to explain it?" I provided the answer. The entire event has already been investigated and the explanations provided and found to be credible and not chargeable. How is anyone going to convince a court to re-open the issue?
Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
36773 posts
Posted on 3/24/24 at 10:45 am to
Bottom line is no evidence or lack of evidence is enough for the posters here. They believe their is fraud, have seen less than all the investigators trying to prove it for them and won't have their mind changed. They rely on media reports and confirmation bias internet articles to support themselves.
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
20053 posts
Posted on 3/24/24 at 11:47 am to
quote:

If you want to believe the GBI, FBI, and previously faithful US Attorneys are all part of a conspiracy, then go right ahead.


Do you want to believe government employees, or people trained to audit and opine on control systems? Because nobody in the latter group thinks the most liberal election systems operate in adequate control environments. The risk of fraud is all that matters. Go read your report again. At the end of Jones interview, he acknowledges that a human’s judgement is necessary to not scan ballots twice. The only control on that is that the public has the right to be present.

quote:

But the question was why has no one "brought charges against these people and forced them to explain it?" I provided the answer. The entire event has already been investigated and the explanations provided and found to be credible and not chargeable. How is anyone going to convince a court to re-open the issue?


You are correct that the investigation makes it hard to take further legal action, it clearly worked on you. I don’t personally find anything credible about it at all.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram