Oh so they couldn’t beat Iowa State because Wade wasn’t coaching, but when Wade was serving a 10 game suspension this year with McNeese and they beat teams like VCU and UAB y’all didn’t have an issue giving him the credit for those wins…seems a little contradictory but ok.

This post was edited on 3/20/24 at 12:07 pm

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Pnels08

Member since Jul 2014

9183 posts

Posted on 3/20/24 at 12:14 pm to JWill409

quote:
seems a little contradictory but ok.

He wasn't even on Campus for the ISU game. He was at least still the HC for McNeese. That's a bit of a difference right?

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Alt26

Member since Mar 2010

28752 posts

Posted on 3/20/24 at 12:17 pm to JWill409

quote:
Oh so they couldn’t beat Iowa State because Wade wasn’t coaching, but when Wade was serving a 10 game suspension this year with McNeese and they beat teams like VCU and UAB y’all didn’t have an issue giving him the credit for those wins…seems a little contradictory but ok.

I don't disagree that LSU team was flawed and probably would have struggled with Iowa St even if Wade were coaching that game. But it's quite ridiculous to compare the two situations.

The LSU team completely unexpectedly lost not only their HC, but their top assistant (Bill Armstrong), literally 6 days before playing a good opponent in the most high pressure game of the season, and only 5 days after learning who that opponent would be.

McNeese, Wade, and his coaching staff knew literally from the day he was was hired that he was not going to be able to coach the first 10 games of the season. It was part of the show cause sanctions. And they knew who their opponents in those 10 games would be for MONTHS prior to playing them. Wade's absence was a shock to no one.

0 ...

Report Post

Tiger Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board