- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: St. George ruling expected tomorrow - predictions?
Posted on 3/18/24 at 9:05 am to Red Stick Rambler
Posted on 3/18/24 at 9:05 am to Red Stick Rambler
My expectation is that it will be a long and overly complicated decision because of how badly the district court and appeals court fricked up.
One court basically said that the entire election was invalid because putting a URL on the petition to the plan of government isn’t putting the plan of government on the petition.
I believe another argued that the impact on BR by StG incorporating means that it should be blocked.
State SC has to figure out a way to unfrick this mess in the easiest way possible.
My guess is that they say that the petition was valid, therefore the vote is valid, but drop Lamont Cole from the case due to lack of standing, therefore StG incorporates due to the case dissolving.
That gets to the correct verdict without litigating a lot of major issues caused by how this was handled, which probably needs to be fricked up by the legislature and not the courts.
One court basically said that the entire election was invalid because putting a URL on the petition to the plan of government isn’t putting the plan of government on the petition.
I believe another argued that the impact on BR by StG incorporating means that it should be blocked.
State SC has to figure out a way to unfrick this mess in the easiest way possible.
My guess is that they say that the petition was valid, therefore the vote is valid, but drop Lamont Cole from the case due to lack of standing, therefore StG incorporates due to the case dissolving.
That gets to the correct verdict without litigating a lot of major issues caused by how this was handled, which probably needs to be fricked up by the legislature and not the courts.
Posted on 3/18/24 at 9:12 am to teke184
What should happen
St. George STACKEDDDD
Baddun rudge frickKKKKEDDDDDD
what inevitably will happen,
Baddun rudgeeee STACKEDDDD
St. George frickKKEDDDDD
Which will lead directly to Baddun rudgeeeeeee getting double dick fricked when the little remaining tax base says adios
St. George STACKEDDDD
Baddun rudge frickKKKKEDDDDDD
what inevitably will happen,
Baddun rudgeeee STACKEDDDD
St. George frickKKEDDDDD
Which will lead directly to Baddun rudgeeeeeee getting double dick fricked when the little remaining tax base says adios
Posted on 3/18/24 at 9:53 am to teke184
quote:
One court basically said that the entire election was invalid because putting a URL on the petition to the plan of government isn’t putting the plan of government on the petition.
I believe another argued that the impact on BR by StG incorporating means that it should be blocked.
Just going off my memory, but I think a big part of the problem was St. George didn't include specifics on how they were going to fund the government in their original Petition so the Petition itself was declared invalid.
Posted on 3/18/24 at 11:00 am to teke184
quote:
One court basically said that the entire election was invalid because putting a URL on the petition to the plan of government isn’t putting the plan of government on the petition.
I think this is where they land. Toss the case and let the legislature fix the requirements for the plan of government to be on the petition.
You may say, well, that wasn't part of the lawsuit until the appeals court added it.
That is correct.
However, we have a US Supreme Court that decided that Obamacare individual and business responsibility provision were a tax, not a penalty, and that was nowhere in any of the arguments either.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)