Started By
Message

re: St. George ruling expected tomorrow - predictions?

Posted on 3/18/24 at 9:05 am to
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96920 posts
Posted on 3/18/24 at 9:05 am to
My expectation is that it will be a long and overly complicated decision because of how badly the district court and appeals court fricked up.

One court basically said that the entire election was invalid because putting a URL on the petition to the plan of government isn’t putting the plan of government on the petition.


I believe another argued that the impact on BR by StG incorporating means that it should be blocked.



State SC has to figure out a way to unfrick this mess in the easiest way possible.

My guess is that they say that the petition was valid, therefore the vote is valid, but drop Lamont Cole from the case due to lack of standing, therefore StG incorporates due to the case dissolving.


That gets to the correct verdict without litigating a lot of major issues caused by how this was handled, which probably needs to be fricked up by the legislature and not the courts.
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
35334 posts
Posted on 3/18/24 at 9:12 am to
What should happen

St. George STACKEDDDD

Baddun rudge frickKKKKEDDDDDD


what inevitably will happen,

Baddun rudgeeee STACKEDDDD

St. George frickKKEDDDDD


Which will lead directly to Baddun rudgeeeeeee getting double dick fricked when the little remaining tax base says adios
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
23245 posts
Posted on 3/18/24 at 9:53 am to
quote:


One court basically said that the entire election was invalid because putting a URL on the petition to the plan of government isn’t putting the plan of government on the petition.


I believe another argued that the impact on BR by StG incorporating means that it should be blocked.


Just going off my memory, but I think a big part of the problem was St. George didn't include specifics on how they were going to fund the government in their original Petition so the Petition itself was declared invalid.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37333 posts
Posted on 3/18/24 at 11:00 am to
quote:

One court basically said that the entire election was invalid because putting a URL on the petition to the plan of government isn’t putting the plan of government on the petition.


I think this is where they land. Toss the case and let the legislature fix the requirements for the plan of government to be on the petition.

You may say, well, that wasn't part of the lawsuit until the appeals court added it.

That is correct.

However, we have a US Supreme Court that decided that Obamacare individual and business responsibility provision were a tax, not a penalty, and that was nowhere in any of the arguments either.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram