- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: COVID Lab Leak Theory Resurfaces After Controversial New Study
Posted on 3/17/24 at 10:37 pm to TigerDoc
Posted on 3/17/24 at 10:37 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
For conspiracies, the longer time goes by without getting compelling evidence, the less likely you'll get it.
But if it’s a zoonotic origin, wouldn’t we at some point know? They’ve spent untold $$$ trying to find the zoonotic source, so if they find that source I’m sure they’d tell us. So why won’t we ever know?
For what it’s worth I agree we “will never know.”
But we know.
3
Posted on 3/17/24 at 10:41 pm to FutureCorridor49
They’ve already conducted several thousand tests on meat samples from the months and years leading up to both Covid and the SADS outbreak 10 years earlier.
For SARS - frozen meat samples procured months before the first human case eventually tested positive all over China. It clearly came from an animal and evolved in a way that enabled human infection.
For Covid….nothing came up in samples that pre-dated the first known human case. Because it didn’t come from animals. It came from a person in Wuhan and then evolved to also infect animals. We’ll never really know how that first person got it or who that person is….but a lab leak is extremely likely.
For SARS - frozen meat samples procured months before the first human case eventually tested positive all over China. It clearly came from an animal and evolved in a way that enabled human infection.
For Covid….nothing came up in samples that pre-dated the first known human case. Because it didn’t come from animals. It came from a person in Wuhan and then evolved to also infect animals. We’ll never really know how that first person got it or who that person is….but a lab leak is extremely likely.
This post was edited on 3/17/24 at 10:47 pm
Posted on 3/17/24 at 10:44 pm to FutureCorridor49
Fauci knows. We know. If we didn't know, Fauci would be questioned using the newest generation of truth serum, then killed. So, we know.
It was done by Fauci The Democrat, who then bobbled the reaction, and muddled the realities so his president could not have accurate information to make the best decisions. In the end, everything was so garbled up that the dishonest voting, 3 am vote drops etc. won.
Fauci won.
The Fauci Elf feels like he accomplished his mission.
It was done by Fauci The Democrat, who then bobbled the reaction, and muddled the realities so his president could not have accurate information to make the best decisions. In the end, everything was so garbled up that the dishonest voting, 3 am vote drops etc. won.
Fauci won.
The Fauci Elf feels like he accomplished his mission.
Posted on 3/17/24 at 10:51 pm to FutureCorridor49
quote:
But if it’s a zoonotic origin, wouldn’t we at some point know?
It depends on the level of certainty you require to "know". Coronaviruses are known to spill over (for example, SARS-1 did this). There is evidence of two separate spillovers occurring at the market, weeks apart, two separate viral lineages. All early cases were there. Photos of SARS-2 susceptible animals were photographed there before the cases emerged. Contra the ancient pre-print above, there's published literature on how this virus is consistent with natural evolution. etc.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News