- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge Scott McAfee is ruling on Fani Willis disqualification tomorrow
Posted on 3/15/24 at 8:14 am to Lsut81
Posted on 3/15/24 at 8:14 am to Lsut81
quote:
And a this begs a question... if there was enough evidence to disqualify one of the two, why not both?
The ruling hasn't been posted yet, but an article I read said they had to choose between either:
1. Full recusal of her office
2. Replacing Wade, which would remove the impropriety at issue
I imagine this is going to be along the lines of their personal relationship more than the financial stuff.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 8:15 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This finding is by no means an indication that the Court condones this tremendous lapse in judgment or the unprofessional manner of the District Attorney’s testimony during the evidentiary hearing. Rather, it is the undersigned’s opinion that Georgia law does not permit the finding of an actual conflict for simply making bad choices – even repeatedly - and it is the trial court’s duty to confine itself to the relevant issues and applicable law properly brought before it. Other forums or sources of authority such as the General Assembly, the Georgia State Ethics Commission, the State Bar of Georgia, the Fulton County Board of Commissioners, or the voters of Fulton County may offer feedback on any unanswered questions that linger. But those are not the issues determinative to the Defendants’ motions alleging an actual conflict.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 8:15 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
2. Replacing Wade, which would remove the impropriety at issue
And how will that address her perjuring herself?
Posted on 3/15/24 at 8:16 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I imagine this is going to be along the lines of their personal relationship more than the financial stuff
yeah, but what about the lying under oath and on court documents?
No way if she does get a conviction, this survives an appeal.
Posted on 3/15/24 at 8:58 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Replacing Wade, which would remove the impropriety at issue
How does this remove the impropriety issue? The impropriety has already been done. It’s 100 percent a part of this case and a part of the Fulton Co DA’s office. You can’t just fire the guy she was fricking and benefiting financially and say we removed the impropriety, all good now.
This post was edited on 3/15/24 at 9:01 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News