Started By
Message

re: 3 corporations now own 19,000 metro Atlanta homes

Posted on 3/11/24 at 4:57 pm to
Posted by Sterling Archer
Austin
Member since Aug 2012
7346 posts
Posted on 3/11/24 at 4:57 pm to
Look up the proposed “End Hedge Fund Control of American Homes Act”.

quote:

The End Hedge Fund Control of American Homes Act seeks to put an end to this harmful practice of hedge funds buying up single-family homes:
•Bans hedge funds from owning single-family homes and requires them to sell at least 10% of the total number of single-family homes they currently own to families per year over a 10-year period.
• Subjects hedge funds to a $50,000 per single family home per year tax penalty on the number of single- family homes owned above either zero or a scheduled 10% reduction per year over 10-years winding down to zero. o After a 10-year full phase-out, all hedge funds will be completely banned from owning any single-family homes.
• Imposes a 50% tax on the fair market value of any future hedge fund purchase of a single-family home.
• Tax penalties paid by hedge funds are reserved for down payment assistance for people seeking to purchase homes sold by hedge funds.
• Ensures the tax penalty focuses on problematic actors by excluding nonprofit organizations, public housing agencies and other government entities.
• Includes an explicit certification process for a purchaser of a hedge fund owned home to confirm that they do not own a majority interest in any other single family residential real estate.


No reason something like this shouldn’t have bipartisan support
This post was edited on 3/11/24 at 5:04 pm
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
20561 posts
Posted on 3/11/24 at 5:05 pm to
So I’m just curious here, if a hedge fund buys a tract of land, develops it into homes, and rents those homes out we don’t like that? Who is losing here? No one made anyone sell the land?

Again, the percentage of people that are losing out on a home purchase to a large investor has to be extremely
Small. The people losing out are probably the mom and pop real estate investors that own 5-10 homes or whatever.

Ultimately real estate is about location and in single family residences it’s extremely difficult to price in location in regards to what the residential buyer will pay compared to a renter. The buyer will almost always win which means an investor can’t afford to purchase where buying is in high demand.

ETA: as said every single person blaming this on democrats wants a democratic/ anti capitalistic solution.
This post was edited on 3/11/24 at 5:07 pm
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
25889 posts
Posted on 3/11/24 at 5:18 pm to
quote:

Includes an explicit certification process for a purchaser of a hedge fund owned home to confirm that they do not own a majority interest in any other single family residential real estate.

This would seem to exclude most non-first time buyers, which seems to be an overreach imo.

Also, there should be a carve out for institutional equity to finance single family rental development and construction. Otherwise that won’t get built, and there is a market for it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram