- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Apple Or Android? May The Battle Continue.
Posted on 3/29/24 at 12:06 pm to Fat Batman
Posted on 3/29/24 at 12:06 pm to Fat Batman
quote:
you are creating imaginary narratives. no one is saying that. why do you keep trying to push this imaginary narrative that iphones are more expensive and/or harder for "demographics" to obtain than androids? you want so hard to make this a classist and pandering argument. its like you believe everyone wants an iphone and those that dont have one only dont because they cant afford it. if android users wanted iphones, they could easily get them.
Maybe you should try reading the link I provided cause you obviously haven't. This is precisely the argument the DOJ is making.
ETA: RIght out the horse's mouth.:
quote:THis is the suit the DOJ filed..
This signals to users that rival smartphones are lower quality because the
experience of messaging friends and family who do not own iPhones is worse—even though
Apple, not the rival smartphone, is the cause of that degraded user experience. Many non-iPhone
users also experience social stigma, exclusion, and blame for “breaking” chats where other
participants own iPhones. This effect is particularly powerful for certain demographics, like
teenagers—where the iPhone’s share is 85 percent, according to one survey. This social pressure
reinforces switching costs and drives users to continue buying iPhones—solidifying Apple’s
smartphone dominance not because Apple has made its smartphone better, but because it has
made communicating with other smartphones worse.
This post was edited on 3/29/24 at 12:23 pm
Posted on 3/29/24 at 12:22 pm to TigerGman
read it and see nothing about this being about poor people not being able to afford more desirable iphones. all i see is the argument that:
quote:
Attorney General Merrick Garland said Apple undermines rivals by having texts from Androids to iPhones suffer from “limited functionality.”
Android users can’t see typing indicators, experience poor video quality and have non-encrypted messages when texting with iPhone users.
Additionally, Apple has stifled rival apps that could have fixed the problem, the DOJ alleged.
quote:
The lawsuit highlighted one notable exchange from Vox Media’s Code Conference in 2022, when an attendee asked Tim Cook to fix Android-to-iPhone texting because they couldn’t “send my mom certain videos.”
“Buy your mom an iPhone,” Cook replied.
quote:
“This social pressure reinforces switching costs and drives users to continue buying iPhones—solidifying Apple’s smartphone dominance not because Apple has made its smartphone better, but because it has made communicating with other smartphones worse,” the suit added.
Posted on 3/29/24 at 12:24 pm to TigerGman
quote:
Maybe you should try reading the link I provided cause you obviously haven't. T
The link (which is NYPost, lol) doesn't reference affordability.
quote:
RIght out the horse's mouth.:
Where does that cite affordability?
YOUR Quote (so you can't edit):
quote:
then we can come in and say certain "demographics" can't afford it, so we are going to take action against you
Bold added by me.
This post was edited on 3/29/24 at 12:25 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)