Started By
Message

re: Steve Garvey was leading Adam Schiff with 1.8 million votes. What happened?

Posted on 3/7/24 at 2:34 am to
Posted by Meauxjeaux
98836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
40163 posts
Posted on 3/7/24 at 2:34 am to
quote:

There's no "algorithms" at play here. The early returns were mostly from small, rural counties in eastern California which were inclined to vote Republican and for Garvey. Most of those counties have most of their tallies in. The urban, mainstream voting coastal counties are still 50% or less counted, even now. And in some counties, Alameda, Santa Clara, San Francisco notably, Barbara Lee and Katie Porter, in addition to Schiff are way ahead of Garvey in votes counted


Can you explain how Garveys vote number went from 1.8 million to 900 thousand?

If they were still counting, shouldn’t ALL totals still be increasing?
Posted by dafif
Member since Jan 2019
5630 posts
Posted on 3/7/24 at 5:48 am to
quote:

Can you explain how Garveys vote number went from 1.8 million to 900 thousand?


Apparently liberals refuse to answer
Posted by tarzana
TX Hwy 6--Brazos River Backwater
Member since Sep 2015
26366 posts
Posted on 3/7/24 at 6:38 am to
quote:

went from 1.8 million to 900 thousand

That never happened
Posted by AirbusDawg
Milton, Ga
Member since Jan 2018
2320 posts
Posted on 3/7/24 at 6:42 am to
I think you are confusing the numbers. There were actually two different things people were voting on. One, the remaining term, and the other the term that will begin in 2025. Garvey is leading the race to serve out the remaining term, but is slightly behind in the general election term. Either way, he had a very strong showing this week.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram