- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How can we realistically share a country with people who think lawfare is acceptable?
Posted on 2/18/24 at 12:00 pm to BobBoucher
Posted on 2/18/24 at 12:00 pm to BobBoucher
Predictably, lawfare seems to be subject to the eye of the beholder.
6
Posted on 2/18/24 at 12:05 pm to cwill
quote:
Predictably, lawfare seems to be subject to the eye of the beholder.
It helps when the mass information blob controls the meaning of words.
Example: change the meaning of "protestor" to "insurrectionist" and you can put protesters in jail for 20 years.
Control the information and you control the people.
Posted on 2/18/24 at 12:15 pm to cwill
quote:
Predictably, lawfare seems to be subject to the eye of the beholder.
When you are changing laws to go after someone with no evidence, or making 9 figure rulings on literal victimless transactions by people who promised to “go after” someone, or prosecute your political enemy for the same actions you’ve absolved your political ally of… when the governor has to make a public statement to reassure local businesses that they won’t be similarly targeted, I don’t think you have the luxury of making that statement.
It’s too obvious. An frankly, I’m shocked that there don’t seem to be any honest liberals left out there to call this out for what it is.
This post was edited on 2/18/24 at 12:18 pm
Posted on 2/18/24 at 12:19 pm to cwill
quote:
Predictably, lawfare seems to be subject to the eye of the beholder.
This is tantamount to you saying that the feelings of the rapist should be considered, simply because they like to rape others.
I can’t imagine defending political persecution.
Again, you are such a goose-stepper.
Posted on 2/18/24 at 2:22 pm to cwill
quote:
Predictably, lawfare seems to be subject to the eye of the beholder.
That’s called TDS. How can you have a civil suit with no victim?
NEVER BEEN DONE BEFORE
Espionage act was created to punish spying. You think a POTUS was a foreign spy? Hell no.
Again: NEVER BEEN DONE BEFORE.
That is lawfare.
Show me where Hunter is being prosecuted in a way that was never done before.
I’ll wait.
Posted on 2/18/24 at 4:46 pm to cwill
quote:
Predictably, lawfare seems to be subject to the eye of the beholder.
True. Whether it be someone's corrupted, Marxist, traitorous mindset like yours or other reasonable, conservative, everyday Americans, like many on this site.
For once, we agree!
Posted on 2/18/24 at 4:54 pm to cwill
quote:Put it this way dipshit.
Predictably, lawfare seems to be subject to the eye of the beholder.
If you or I did what Hunter Biden has done, we’d be in prison.
If you or I did what Trump did, no charges would have been brought.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News