Yeah, I don't see how anyone could argue Tiger over Jack at this point. Tiger was dominant but he had half a career. Jack played at an elite level for over 25 years and then dominated the Senior Tour for another 10 just for good measure.

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by slackster

Houston

Member since Mar 2009

85389 posts

Posted on 2/16/24 at 11:44 pm to AUFANATL

quote:
eah, I don't see how anyone could argue Tiger over Jack at this point. Tiger was dominant but he had half a career. Jack played at an elite level for over 25 years and then dominated the Senior Tour for another 10 just for good measure.

Pretty simple - if you have to win a tournament to save your life, you’re taking prime Tiger over any other golfer.

Also, 82 > 73. That plus his major and amateur career are enough.

This post was edited on 2/16/24 at 11:46 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by lsupride87

Member since Dec 2007

96197 posts

Posted on 2/17/24 at 8:53 am to AUFANATL

quote:
Yeah, I don't see how anyone could argue Tiger over Jack at this point.

Really?

Tigers peak dominates Jack. Also, Tiger leads jack in total wins as well

If you want to have Jack ahead because of 19 vs 17 that’s fine, but it’s very easy to see why someone would have tiger

Tiger leads jack in almost every single category outside majors

This post was edited on 2/17/24 at 8:55 am

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Dawgsontop34

Member since Jun 2014

42727 posts

Posted on 2/18/24 at 12:41 pm to AUFANATL

quote:
I don't see how anyone could argue Tiger over Jack at this point.

I think you argue it based on the depth of fields. Not that Tiger’s era was as strong as today’s fields, but it was definitely tougher than Jack’s era.

2 ...

Report Post

More Sports - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board